The90
Registered User
- Feb 27, 2017
- 6,109
- 4,862
Which is exactly what we mean (and he knows that)I suspect they mean in terms of pace (adjusted for the lower total games played).
Personally see him hitting a 40 point pace if the stars align
Which is exactly what we mean (and he knows that)I suspect they mean in terms of pace (adjusted for the lower total games played).
Personally see him hitting a 40 point pace if the stars align
Which is exactly what we mean (and he knows that)
How many points are you expecting Hyman to get if he is there? Who ever plays the left side on that line is there as a support player and isnt expected to get ppg.it really doesn’t matter 40 point pace is 100% not good enough for a team trying to win a cup. Wow some of you have set a low bar because of? nostalgia I guess. Thornton should see zero ice time with marner and matthews outside of occasional pp and very occasionally line juggling. He’s past it, he’s a 3rd liner at absolute best and great in the room. I can’t wait a season of joe f***ing Thornton trying to drag his carcass around trying to keep up with matthews and marner or even nylander (and tavares but he isn’t too fast himself)
You know every player on every teams top 6 arent all stars. That’s not how it works.How many points are you expecting Hyman to get if he is there? Who ever plays the left side on that line is there as a support player and isnt expected to get ppg.
Lol I think you're miss-reading what I'm saying. I agree not all players in the top 6 are ppg players and whoever is on the left side on the top line is there to support, whether its hyman, Thornton or someone else.You know every player on every teams top 6 arent all stars. That’s not how it works.
He’s literally a depth player. And he’s literally here to give 30-40 points. That’s it.
you getting your panties in a knot because He’s not a ppg guy tells me you’re very unrealistic in your expectations of a salary capped team, are very pessimistic, don’t understand that there are only so many minutes to give out and can’t see that moving hyman down has the reverse effect of balancing out a competent third line. I’d wager you just wanted to complain
4 points in 15 less games? Don’t think so
Lol, I meant to reply to the enlightened** poster. My bad brosefLol I think you're miss-reading what I'm saying. I agree not all players in the top 6 are ppg players and whoever is on the left side on the top line is there to support, whether its hyman, Thornton or someone else.
A 38-year old Marleau with Matthews and Marner on the 1st line by Babcock -- pure blasphemy!
A 41-year old Thornton with Matthews and Marner on the 1st line by Keefe -- pure genius!
How many points are you expecting Hyman to get if he is there? Who ever plays the left side on that line is there as a support player and isnt expected to get ppg.
"The equivalent of 40-45 points" per my original post.
How was that third line last year? Brutal? You don’t sayhe had 37 in 51 last year. So roughly that. Which I think you can agree is better than 40 point pace
he had 37 in 51 last year. So roughly that. Which I think you can agree is better than 40 point pace
our contending teams first line is hoping for “the equivalent of 40-45 points” from one of its wingers?
I dont get it. You think 45 points is bad?our contending teams first line is hoping for “the equivalent of 40-45 points” from one of its wingers?
ugh Jumbo , im fired up to see this guy play but 3rd line and maybe top 6 every now and then but putting him top line to start??? its like some video game fantasy non sense
I’m not the coach. I didn’t put him on our first line.
I dont get it. You think 45 points is bad?