A lot like Howard.
Interesting to note.
Playoff records in the six years of Howard's contract.
Howard 1 win vs 4 losses
Mrazek 9 wins vs 11 losses.
a lot alike, except one nut jobbed himself out of town.
A lot like Howard.
Interesting to note.
Playoff records in the six years of Howard's contract.
Howard 1 win vs 4 losses
Mrazek 9 wins vs 11 losses.
I don't think anyone is obsessed with Howard. We talk about him because, unlike Mrazek, he is on the Red Wings.I equally can't understand how obsessed some are with Howard? Mediocre at best but many talk about his All Star games as some barometer of good.
When someone tells me that Howard is above average because he made the All Star team it's one of two things. Obsessed or Homer.I don't think anyone is obsessed with Howard. We talk about him because, unlike Mrazek, he is on the Red Wings.
When someone tells me that Howard is above average because he made the All Star team it's one of two things. Obsessed or Homer.
a lot alike, except one nut jobbed himself out of town.
The one who upset the capitals in round one last year? That one?
When was the last time Jimmy Howard upset anyone in the playoffs? NCAA?
Anyway, the Mrazek angle is just one reason why the $32M contract was stupid.
Go ahead and make the case for Howard earned the money.
Mrazek did that all by himself? With his .899 save % for the series?The one who upset the capitals in round one last year? That one?
When was the last time Jimmy Howard upset anyone in the playoffs? NCAA?
Anyway, the Mrazek angle is just one reason why the $32M contract was stupid.
Go ahead and make the case for Howard earned the money.
Or he is probably hovering around 10-20 for most of his career in terms of #1 in the league which is also pretty true of Howard. It isn't defending him so much as answering people calling him a backup with interesting no NHL personnel share your opinion at all... Which if you think he is in the 10-15 which he has been for times he is above average. Either way I think a decent chunk of this argument comes from a Jimmy is an awful starter case and while yes he has some downsides, Howard isn't awful either so it is more the polarization of the argument that attracts these so called defenders in my opinion.
Ohhhh noooo, this is going to be a nice hill for some to die on. Just like the last samurai, only Tom Cruise is worthy.Yikes.
I was looking for a dead horse, luckily I clicked on this thread.
The current best goalie in the world has missed three of the last four post-seasons while making almost twice as much. I think it is more of the don't pay goalies angle that I am more willing to hear. We paid Howard like a middle tier to actually towards the end of his contract bottom teens goalie in terms of the salary. That was exactly what he was for most of it. He might not have earned it in your opinion, but he is closer to the market value than I think you're appreciating.
I don't think Jimmy Howard is what is holding this team back.
Mrazek did that all by himself? With his .899 save % for the series?
That's quite a feat.
Oddly reminiscent of his career so far. Also a trait elite, winning goaltenders tend not to have.Really? Who said he did it by himself?
Regardless.
.899 against the defending cup champs.
Nobody had any complaints about Mrazek's play.
Here's how other goalies did the previous year.
Fleury .853
Vasilvesky .906
Murray .905
Bobrovsky .900
Mrazek had a couple awful games - but he also stood on his head in the final two games of the series.
Anyway, you're making it more about Mrazek than Howard.
The key point I made was that Howard wasn't worth his contract.
And the facts make that plain.
The one who upset the capitals in round one last year? That one?
When was the last time Jimmy Howard upset anyone in the playoffs? NCAA?
Anyway, the Mrazek angle is just one reason why the $32M contract was stupid.
Go ahead and make the case for Howard earned the money.
You said he did.Really? Who said he did it by himself?
Regardless.
.899 against the defending cup champs.
Nobody had any complaints about Mrazek's play.
Here's how other goalies did the previous year.
Fleury .853
Vasilvesky .906
Murray .905
Bobrovsky .900
Mrazek had a couple awful games - but he also stood on his head in the final two games of the series.
Anyway, you're making it more about Mrazek than Howard.
The key point I made was that Howard wasn't worth his contract.
And the facts make that plain.
The one who got yanked against the Bruins and had a sub .900 sv% for the playoffs, and who couldn't fend off Brien Elliot and Michael Neuvirth for the starting job on the Flyers the year before?
Howard's contract doesn't matter to me.
You said he did.
"The one who upset the Capitals in round one..." The Hurricanes upset the Capitals, not Mrazek.
I'm not making it more about Mrazek, you're the one who started this whole thing. The Wings had to choose between two goalies. One is an NHL starting goaltender, the other has yet to definitively prove that he is.
Mrazek might be the cheaper of the two, but don't mistake the reason why.
Well, if you don't mind drastically overpaying a mediocre player, that's a stress-free way to be a fan of a grossly mismanaged team. I envy you.
Mrazek came back early from a groin injury and sucked against Boston.
It's going to be interesting to see if Mrazek builds on the season he had last year.
He's still 27. He could be a solid NHL goalie for another 7-8 years.
It's stress free because what would shaving a couple of million off a cap hit do? Would we have wanted a better goalie? And since it's unlikely a better goalie would have been signed, the Wings would have just had musical chairs at another position for the past few years. Howard is a placeholder until the team is better and, hopefully, a better guy is coming up through the system. In the mean time, he offers a bit of stability and seems to be a good locker room guy, things that probably take on a bit more importance when the team is lousy and it's not fun showing up at the rink every day.
If he couldn't play, he shouldn't have been on the ice. Especially when the Canes weren't exactly sacrificing anything with McElhinney in net. I'm hoping for Mrazek, too. I liked him, pulled for him for years. Hopefully bouncing around the league will help get himself sorted a bit.
Don't forget to add Mrazek to that list, he still makes less now than he did as an RFA.A couple million here.
A couple million there.
A couple million there.
Are you seriously going to argue that overpaying players doesn't matter?
Man.
I guess maybe it didn't matter. Holland was driving this team to the basement anyway.
Howard.
Ericsson.
Helm.
Abdelkader.
Quincey.
Weiss.
Samuelsson.
Nielsen.
Cleary.
Tootoo.
Colaiacovo.
Legwand.
Cole.
Zidlicky.
That 2011-17 era Holland.... my God.
It's not a misrepresentation, it's literally your words. You said he's the one who upset Washington.That's a stretch.
Mrazek got credit for 4 wins that series. He did beat Washington. So did Carolina.
I never said he did it by himself. That's a pretty bad misrepresentation of my point.
My only mention of Mrazek was to say I didn't think we had any cause to sign Howard to the rotten deal he signed.
I'll defend that.