Anyone notice how Jimbos 4th line is more expensive than his third
Prust (2.5) Vey (1) Dorsett (2.65)=8.15
Higgins (2.5) Horvat (1.744) Hansen (2.5)=6.744
So it is possible he(Hamhuis) could resign with the team if he/Benning wanted to sign another contract.
I think you might want to redo your math
The example I can think of that serves to answer your question is Matt Moulson:
Oct 27th 2013 he gets dealt to Buffalo by the Islanders
March 5th 2014 he gets dealt to Minnesota by Buffalo
July 1st 2014 he as a free agent signs with Buffalo on a 5x5 deal.
So it is possible he(Hamhuis) could resign with the team if he/Benning wanted to sign another contract.
McNally also had the 1 year suspension for cheating. Character may have been an issue, and Benning may have wished to avoid any questions about it/ didn't want to talk smack about McNally.... just ramble some nonsense like usual...? i dunno
I get the impression niether side were too keen on him signing here. Too bad, because I always thought he had decent potential.
No.
Read up on it.
While we are talking McNally Benning once again messed that up, I can't find the quote but he says stuff like this (from sekeres twitter)
#Canucks GM Benning says d-man prospect Patrick McNally was dealt because too similar and not as good as Jordan Subban, Ben Hutton
10:53 AM - 27 Jun 2015
Probably why he thought it was a good idea to trade Forsling for Clendenning, guy is awful at evaluating players. Thin on blueline prospects? We got 2 offensive ones we don't need him apparently
I don't think it had anything to do with McNally not wanting to sign here, he even said it came as a surprise
“The trade came as a bit of a surprise to me, but when it happened I talked to a couple of guys from San Jose, and my agent thought it was a good fit,†said McNally, who is currently taking two summer classes at Harvard and plans to complete his degree in August. “They seemed like they were excited to have me, so it kind of moved quickly after that.â€
http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2...jose-sharks-harvard-michalek-wild-hart-tampa/
While we are talking McNally Benning once again messed that up, I can't find the quote but he says stuff like this (from sekeres twitter)
#Canucks GM Benning says d-man prospect Patrick McNally was dealt because too similar and not as good as Jordan Subban, Ben Hutton
10:53 AM - 27 Jun 2015
Probably why he thought it was a good idea to trade Forsling for Clendenning, guy is awful at evaluating players. Thin on blueline prospects? We got 2 offensive ones we don't need him apparently
I don't think it had anything to do with McNally not wanting to sign here, he even said it came as a surprise
“The trade came as a bit of a surprise to me, but when it happened I talked to a couple of guys from San Jose, and my agent thought it was a good fit,” said McNally, who is currently taking two summer classes at Harvard and plans to complete his degree in August. “They seemed like they were excited to have me, so it kind of moved quickly after that.”
http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2...jose-sharks-harvard-michalek-wild-hart-tampa/
ignore me
Well there is definitely a lot of time on this transaction to see if he got it right.
Not much mention on what was probably what his biggest strike... His drive.. He's obviously gifted... But does he have the drive to take his gm to the next level... Benning didn't think so... Time will tell if he was right.
Sbisa top 4, Vey top 6 center, Prust is a good skater, even he knows how questionable his evaluations are look how quickly he discarded Bonino and Clendening, and acquires Sutter who doesn't play at all like Benning describes
Numbers suggest Sutter is difficult to score against.. Sbisa filled in admirably.. Vey was a rookie.. And Prust I'll find out first hand...
If Bonino could get by as a 2nd line centre with his skating, Vey also has a chance develop into one as well.
Numbers show that Sutter magically makes his goaltenders better.
Sutter isn't particularly good at stopping HSC/SC/CA/FA He's actually pretty mediocre at.
Can't wait for the eye test now.
If Benning tells Hamhuishe is trading him to a contender but will try to sign him as a UFA, Hamhuis has a high chance of coming back. This is a guy who went from the Preds to Flyers to Penguins before coming to Vancouver. If the term and money is right he will re-sign with the Canucks.So personally I'd bet if he gets moved Hamhuis isn't coming back.
While we are talking McNally Benning once again messed that up, I can't find the quote but he says stuff like this (from sekeres twitter)
#Canucks GM Benning says d-man prospect Patrick McNally was dealt because too similar and not as good as Jordan Subban, Ben Hutton
10:53 AM - 27 Jun 2015
Probably why he thought it was a good idea to trade Forsling for Clendenning, guy is awful at evaluating players. Thin on blueline prospects? We got 2 offensive ones we don't need him apparently
If Benning tells Hamhuishe is trading him to a contender but will try to sign him as a UFA, Hamhuis has a high chance of coming back. This is a guy who went from the Preds to Flyers to Penguins before coming to Vancouver. If the term and money is right he will re-sign with the Canucks.
I wanted Benning to sign McNally but McNally is at this point nothing more than an average prospect and there are contract limits. Maybe McNally is an average prospect unlikely to ever make it to the NHL. Do you disagree that Subban and Hutton are ahead of McNally? I can't even say McNally is ahead of McEneny, Sautner, and Cederholm.
I think that will change, or at least mellow, once the whole team is assembled and on the ice. Really, if you dismiss the cost, the team looks a little improved. Mot leaps and bounds better, but a little better suited to Desjardins. I think people will calm down about various managerial moves once they see what was being undertaken and how it turned out.
Uhh no, we most definitely did not improve. Our project roster is older than last season, and on paper at least we are worse than last season, while still being pressed against the cap.
I don't know how it's possible to get older, worse, and more expensive, but Benning found a way.
I think we are in line for at least one more Kassian-level blue-screen-of-death moment during the season, perhaps when things start going noticeably sour. Either a terrible Hamhuis/Vrbata trade, or the dealing of a high draft pick for some fringe vet or something.We should be in for just a hilariously bad year. Not even talking about our eventual record.
He is probably ahead of Sautner and cederholm. He also fits the magical age gap.
Uhh no, we most definitely did not improve. Our project roster is older than last season, and on paper at least we are worse than last season, while still being pressed against the cap.
I don't know how it's possible to get older, worse, and more expensive, but Benning found a way.