Pittsburgh applying salve to Jets wounds
Wait, now i feel weird again:
I'm sorry, but Buff was working well outside the gameplan there. That was not some sort of "man" coverage.
He could have switched off with Perreault, it's not out of the realm of possibility. Actually if you look at the play, it appears for a split second that's what Perreault expected to happen. I'm not blaming Buff but as a D in a man coverage situation, it's not that normal for them to go chasing guys up that high. Perreault still should have picked up Nylander, he did initially but let him go. It was a poor play.Sigh. So what is Buff supposed to do? Drop back to be a nice screen along with Perreault? I've explained exhaustively why he made the right play. Explain to me why he is was out of position and what defensemen are supposed to do when a guy walks up the wall?
He could have switched off with Perreault, it's not out of the realm of possibility. Actually if you look at the play, it appears for a split second that's what Perreault expected to happen. I'm not blaming Buff but as a D in a man coverage situation, it's not that normal for them to go chasing guys up that high. Perreault still should have picked up Nylander, he did initially but let him go. It was a poor play.
I didn't say anything about players being constrained by positions, rotation is my exact point in fact. Players being in a spot that best suits the team doesn't mean being rigid, defensive responsibility is always fluid but that doesn't mean you don't want your best players in certain situations, playing certain roles. Perreault appeared to want to rotate off of Nylander and pick up Matthews as he came up the wall, perhaps he didn't communicate that, perhaps he just expected it to happen. Regardless he blew the coverage and was clearly confused as to what his responsibility was. I don't think there is much arguing Buff is much more effective to have down low, without suggesting that is where he has to be as defined by his position all of the time. 5 man defensive units aren't a hard concept but teams still play with certain positional strengths.How does switching off a guy make a difference here? Good teams don't use LD, RD, C, LW, RW. They use X1, X2, X3, X4, X5. Being overly constrained by "positions" is a recipe for disaster. You have to be able to rotate into proper spots. In facts what's happening here as the LW is playing the "C" spot, the RD is playing the "LD" spot, the C is playing the "LW" spot, and the LD is playing the "RD" spot. If Perreault wanted to switch as plays moves up he needs to communicate that if he feels it'll be better, but I fail to see how it does in this case. Just because a player is listed somewhere does not mean they should be rigidly in spots.
Toronto is a good team don’t kid yourself and WELL COACHEDExcept it's toronto and not Chicago
By comparison, letting in 7 goals> letting in 10 goals. I feel vindicated and hopeful
By comparison, letting in 7 goals> letting in 10 goals. I feel vindicated and hopeful
Toronto is a good team don’t kid yourself and WELL COACHED
We got a dose of humble pie.
That’s not always a bad thing either.
Not as good as Chicago tho
Would rather lose to Chicago in that style than a lesser team
Seen enough of this, year after year
Pittsburgh just got smashed in their home opener...does this help bring things into perspective?
They lost 5-4 in OT in their home opener. That's hardly getting smashed. Last nights game was a B2B with travel involved. The game was in Chicago so it was also in a different time zone.
Pittsburgh just got smashed in their home opener...does this help bring things into perspective?
Yes and no.
As someone above said, the Pens have won two Stanley Cups in two years. The get a free pass once in a while.
The Jets on the other hand? The have been a mediocre team for a bunch of years, with the same systemic issues year after year. No more free passes.