Romang67
BitterSwede
We should get Subban, Stastny and ROR. I think that would help us.
Do you think MTL and Colorado would match 3 one million dollar offers?
Do you think MTL and Colorado would match 3 one million dollar offers?
Statsny isn't coming to winnipeg
I think you're spot on.
I would think he's using other teams to squeeze the most possible dollars out of the Avs. We can dream, but reality will up and slap us in the face when he re-signs with Colorado.
Nice to hear if true. Chevy isn't looking to make a trade for the sake of making a trade:
http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog/Dan-Petriw/Deal-or-No-Deal/184/60869
"Winnipeg has looked like a good trade partner with the Islanders for some time but recent news leads me to believe that they will not strip down their roster and rebuild. The asking price for Evander Kane is high and rightfully so. I was told this morning that the Jets do not want to move him but they would entertain offers. These offers would have to include a first round pick, a top six forward and team’s top prospect. Also it appears that the Jets want to hold onto defenseman Dustin Byfuglien. "
Raymond wants 3x3 according to hope smoke who is quoting dreger
http://ww2.nationalpost.com/m/wp/bl...eks-to-fix-a-franchise-2014-the-winnipeg-jets
National Post article on the Jets.
I wish I wouldn't have wasted my time reading that. Tons of inaccuracies and seems to be written by someone who has a much lower level of understanding of the Jets and hockey in general.
The only thing they got right is Pavelec.
I am happy to read about Kane but keeping Buff if true is beyond stupid. What is the end game, here? What do they think the org with accomplish with Byfuglien in the lineup in the next two years that is significant enough to lose an asset for nothing? A very attractive asset! If they keep Buff AND P***** is our starter then that is beyond incompetent.
They preach draft and develop in order to build up depth and control costs, and yet they would let assets just walk out the door. They pay guys who don't earn the money and negatively affect the teams chances to make the playoffs, make MORE money, and give our other players valuable experience.
It just reeks of incompetence. I do realize I am going off about something written on HockeyBuzz but the part that bugs me is that I could actually see that precise scenario play out.
I am happy to read about Kane but keeping Buff if true is beyond stupid. What is the end game, here? What do they think the org with accomplish with Byfuglien in the lineup in the next two years that is significant enough to lose an asset for nothing? A very attractive asset! If they keep Buff AND P***** is our starter then that is beyond incompetent.
They preach draft and develop in order to build up depth and control costs, and yet they would let assets just walk out the door. They pay guys who don't earn the money and negatively affect the teams chances to make the playoffs, make MORE money, and give our other players valuable experience.
It just reeks of incompetence. I do realize I am going off about something written on HockeyBuzz but the part that bugs me is that I could actually see that precise scenario play out.
I'm looking forward to the vitriol aimed at Chevy when Stastny signs elsewhere.
#whatdidchevydotoday
I guess that depends on what Buffs intentions are. He's been seen hanging out with Ladd in BC. His Mom doesn't live to far from here in Minnesota. If he actually likes it here and is willing to reup there might be logic to keeping him in the hybrid situation. Granted the team will then have to find other means to fill out there holes. It seems that Chevy has been sniffing around some key FA so good news on that front. Granted my first inclination like you is to move him, but I would hope management has a good grasp on what his intentions are.
Not disagreeing that possibly moving Buff if his value is high, but there could he a scenario that Buff re signs here and we have him to 35 or so.
Not saying that is the right way or not, but everyone on the roster doesn't have to necessarily be traded once they get close to 30. The ones that are not going to stay should be dealt for sure. Situations where you need to start over and rebuild, sure. But maybe Buff sticks around?
Agreed, Jet. Buff would be perfect in a 'win now' model, as I expect his decline to start once he hits 29. He'll be a hard man to move off the puck still, but I forsee a lot of hip, groin, and knee problems for him in the future. I love Buff for what he brings, but his value will likely be on another team.
Then again, Zdeno Chara is like 39 (not really lol) and is still playing a high calibre of hockey.
Chara is extremely fit.
I think you're spot on.
I would think he's using other teams to squeeze the most possible dollars out of the Avs. We can dream, but reality will up and slap us in the face when he re-signs with Colorado.
I'd rather make a play for ROR.
I agree with keeping players past 30 if they look like they won't have steep decline. I would love to keep Ladd til he retires. Enstrom, if he can get some healthy seasons together I would love to see stay here past 30. Byfuglien just concerns me. I don't think he will be effective once he starts to decline, and I see that decline coming fast and hard.
That's valid. It just seems like sometimes the automatic assumption sometimes is that we need to move everyone once they get close to 30.
gary lawless @garylawless
Buff and the #nhljets #9 pick for Florida's #1? Chatter is out there #nhl
Agreed, I think Chipman and Chevy are going to grow tired of this sort of BS with him, if he doesn't want to be here then there's the door. He's going to get trade either at the draft or before the season or before this seasons trade deadline. It's going to happen.
Surprised Lawless' latest tweet hasn't been discussed.
Surprised Lawless' latest tweet hasn't been discussed.