periferal
Registered User
- Jul 5, 2007
- 28,743
- 16,123
Everyone understands that a draft pick is an asset. That's why many of us are happy that a draft pick was used as an asset and exchanged for a player. You felt the valuation was off, so they are explaining why they feel the value of said asset was a fair exchange for the player in question. Nothing about evaluating an asset based on its value were it not to be spent suggests that they do not feel it can be used as an asset. In fact, their satisfaction with having used it as an asset suggests quite the opposite.
You, and many others, may understand that a draft pick is an asset, but not everyone does. That is for sure. I think you're posting on behalf of other people who get it, but several don't.
Also the debate shouldn't be: Pageau vs the 2020 1st and 2020 2nd. It should be...Were the 2020 1st and 2020 2nd used to their maximum value?
I can both like Pageau and also think they weren't. There's also a handful of people out there that hate me as a poster and/or cannot see the nuance of that point as well.
That said the bottom line point that should be discussed is...How is Lou going to create a legit Stanley Cup contending lineup now with the limited assets and cap space we have left?
Because if you watched the game today it's plain as day that there is a serious chasm in talent between a team like Boston and us. And if that isn't addressed somehow this offseason, then once again we'll still be closer to an 8 seed in 2021 than Cup contender.