Seeing as twitter is tearing him apart and he will probably lose everything even if judged not guilty im not sure why you would even say this.
Funny that didn't happen to Patrick Kane...
Seeing as twitter is tearing him apart and he will probably lose everything even if judged not guilty im not sure why you would even say this.
1970 man. Look at our cousin franchise. Both cursed.This franchise is cursed. What caused it?
This is victim-blaming though. Women shouldn't need to fear men any more than men need to fear women.If you're meeting a guy alone at a hotel he is obviously expecting sex. It doesn't make it consensual however.
I think women should talk about rape culture and understand that men can not be trusted when alcohol drugs or opportunity are involved. There should be some warning on dating and hook up sites as well.
I think women should talk about rape culture and understand that men can not be trusted when alcohol drugs or opportunity are involved. There should be some warning on dating and hook up sites as well.
As stated in the article, at this time - the claim is unsubstantiated.
However, is it true that women are assaulted by men at rates far higher than people want to admit? Yup. Is it true that a significant minority of these claims against high profile individuals are false and it comes out that they were made up? Yup. Does court saying there wasn’t proof beyond a reasonable doubt mean it didn’t happen? Nope. Does a settlement mean it did or didn’t happen? Nope. (Look at the recent Ronaldo/Vegas allegation)
If someone I was close to and trusted came and told me they were the victim of an SA, I’d believe them 100% as I have in the past. But when I don’t know anyone personally and it’s all alleged/unsubstantiated at the time, it’s tough.
My guess would be not too long. Even if Benning et al. are useless, I'd assume Aquaman would want to head off any bad PR asap and waiting doesn't do that at all. I could be wrong or ascribing the wrong motives to the people involved but that's my guess.In a hockey related sense, the big question now is how long the team knew about this for.
I'd like to note that in many instances this is a direct pushback against the inadequacies of the justice system especially when it comes to sexual crimes.But on the other, our society is set up in a way where people are getting cancelled regardless of guilt or intent.
It is possible that the victim did not want to give evidence at a criminal trial so no charges were laid. That happens a lot.This is a bad situation for all involved. At best, he’s a young hockey player that put himself in a potentially bad situation that a more mature person wouldn’t have. Beyond that, who knows? If they agreed to meet, there has to be some responsibility on her part, but if she was mislead and the situation got awkward and he didn’t take no for an answer, then he’s a grade “A” POS who deserves every punishment he gets. Has there been a pattern of behaviour like this for Virtanen? Given that no formal charges have been filed, the Crown prosecutor obviously did not think a conviction was possible, but if more accusations are coming out of the woodwork, then things aren’t going to go away for Jake. Nor should they.
My guess would be not too long. Even if Benning et al. are useless, I'd assume Aquaman would want to head off any bad PR asap and waiting doesn't do that at all. I could be wrong or ascribing the wrong motives to the people involved but that's my guess.
He's not even a player you *need* to have in your lineup.There are (unconfirmed) reports they knew about it before the last game and played him anyway, which is not a terribly good look.
It'll depend on exactly what they'd heard and when. I can understand a coach not wanting to pull a player over a rumor. This is if the news had even reached him yet given the layers of legal and HR it would likely have to pass through to reach the coach at all. For an organization to react in only a day or two is actually pretty decent even if it doesn't always look that way.There are (unconfirmed) reports they knew about it before the last game and played him anyway, which is not a terribly good look.
yes but "hearing things" vs having someone come forward in an official capacity is a massive massive difference as an employerThere are (unconfirmed) reports they knew about it before the last game and played him anyway, which is not a terribly good look.
I hope it doesn't need to be said but just in case, obviously if true the priority is the victim. Beyond that, in terms of its impact on the Canucks, if he's terminated for cause do we still carry the cap or is that wiped out?
This franchise is cursed. What caused it?
A player doing something deplorable like this isn't an organization curse. It's a f***ed up choice a player made that has a negative lifelong impact on the victim. If Virtanen is indeed guilty of this he should be in jail.
I'm not advocating one way or another but sexual assault is quite clearly the one realm of criminal law where "innocent until proven guilty" completely undermines the actual pursuit of justice and contributes to the problem of rape culture.
If you're meeting a guy alone at a hotel he is obviously expecting sex. It doesn't make it consensual however.
I think women should talk about rape culture and understand that men can not be trusted when alcohol drugs or opportunity are involved. There should be some warning on dating and hook up sites as well.
Well it can't be helped, not like we could've picked Nylander or Ehlers or practically ANYONE else, right?
...RIGHT?!?!!!
If you're meeting a guy alone at a hotel he is obviously expecting sex. It doesn't make it consensual however.
I think women should talk about rape culture and understand that men can not be trusted when alcohol drugs or opportunity are involved. There should be some warning on dating and hook up sites as well.