Worse than Messier?I think when you consider his performance relative to expectations, the opportunity cost of drafting him and later qualifying him, his apparent lack of dedication and professionalism, and all the off-ice stuff, you can make a strong argument that Jake is the worst Canuck of all-time.
Worse than Messier?
Canucks shouldn’t have even drafted Virtanen. No hindsight needed on that either.
Yep, this was not hindsight. I recall a good number of posters thought we'd get Nylander instead.
you mean a Swedish center(at that point could have still been one) that could learn behind hank and help replace the offense we lost from losing our #2 center that year.
yea a few of us wanted him lol
And I think some people also looked at Ehlers pretty closely.
But...hindsight, right?
My recollection is that by draft day the mood was there Virtanen would be picked, but of course there was plenty of people who didn't want that compared to Nylander and Ehlers (forgotten in this is that Nick Ritchie was wanted by a handful as wellYep, this was not hindsight. I recall a good number of posters thought we'd get Nylander instead.
What possible reason could the Canucks be able to terminate Jake’s contract? Is there a “must come in shape to camp” clause?Contract termination incoming.
Maybe he can take Kovys spot at Avangard
There were rumours management wanted him, and he was within a group of very good prospects in the same range (he wasn't a total reach), but most thought he was at the bottom of that group (Nylander, Ehlers, Ritchie, Fleury and Virtanen).My recollection is that by draft day the mood was there Virtanen would be picked, but of course there was plenty of people who didn't want that compared to Nylander and Ehlers (forgotten in this is that Nick Ritchie was wanted by a handful as well
Jessop's Virtanen Is Good. So Don’t Draft Him article has obviously aged like a fine wine
I mean i dont really use twitter for anything except "art" purposes anyways, but i would stay away from the hockey side of it for the time being.This may be a loophole to frustrate his contract. Not sure if they have a clause in there when players act unbecoming of a professional.
I’m not chiming in on if he’s guilty or innocent because people a lot smarter than me may need to figure that out in court etc. I know the self righteous crowd will want to cancel him without due course because that seems to be the cool thing to do now.
Even if the rumours turn out to be completely untrue, the Canucks should have traded him instead of qualifying him.
No hindsight needed on that one.
What rumor? (against rules to link I guess). I feel like I'm missing something.
Yeah, a number of posts were (rightfully) deleted.
I believe that Benning should have traded Virtanen in the offseason rather than qualifying him, that's the main point.