F A N
Registered User
- Aug 12, 2005
- 18,773
- 5,985
Ew. Please don't put the words "defend" and "Benning" next to each other
Sorry but I still don't know what you're trying to say here. I've never seen such neutral comments
Try experiencing the world more. Read more books.
If Benning wasn't sold on him then he should of been moved at some point, not signed to too much money ahead of guys like Toffoli, Stecher etc right after he just said how unimpressed he was with him.. All your argument is doing is pointing out more managerial incompetence.
You're conflating things. Not being sold on him doesn't mean that he didn't still believe he had upside or at least be able to contribute to the team. You should read over the Virtanen threads here. It encompasses a lot of views that helps illustrates why Virtanen was re-signed but only for 2 years.
I've been saying the exact same things for 7 years, I haven't flip flopped on Jake once. He's not an NHL player. He's actually gone on similar streaks like this before so taking that bet wouldn't be very outlandish at all, really. He's a horrible, low IQ player who can grab points using physical gifts if all the stars align and if he can get on a lucky-run. He's a 10 goals 10 assists guy at best who makes bonehead plays more often than good ones, doesn't kill penalties, takes bad penalties, isn't good defensively and kills the cycle in the offensive zone every time.
You weren't here for the past 7 years so no idea what you have been saying but I have no reason to doubt your hatred towards Virtanen.
Virtanen has been an NHL player who provided good value in his last contract. Again, just because he sucks this season and most of us wish Benning traded him in the offseason doesn't mean that he didn't provide value for what the Canucks paid him the past two seasons. Jake did show progression up to the play-in/playoffs. Again, read the thread. Almost all of us wanted Jake to succeed but frustrated that he's not putting in the effort and performance.