He wasn't talking about Guenztel, he was talking Rakell when he said what happened to him he used to be good.
You can't be serious. You wouldn't get a prospect the level of Kasper or Danielson for a rental. You expect them to add a 1st and even more after it?
There's a big difference in Vancouver 1st vs Detroit 1st also.
The redwings aren't trading for a player like Jake for a rental this year, that would be a stupid waste of assets.
They should only be trading for him with either an extension in place or knowing they can resign him to be a long term left winger next to larkins.
He's a guy who for the next 5 years is putting up potentially between 30 and 40 goals in that spot each year going forward.
So yeah I'm expecting a major asset back. I said either Danielsson and buium OR kaspar and berggen with the first IF a cap dump the level of maata or chariot is included is fair.
And I believe it is with the assumption Detroit is keeping Jake long term which is the only way a trade with Detroit makes sense.
Neither Danielsson or kaspar would make as much of an impact of Detroit's ability to be successful over the next five seasons, while larkin/decat are in their primes and Raymond is reaching his full potential as having Jake would, and Detroit would only lose one of them and still have a rather flush
I used the top prospect, plus b-minus, plus 1st, plus useful right now level nhler to compare what Vancouver gave up. And even in that kuzmenko is a hell of a lot better player than Rasmussen.