Haha
See now I know you have no idea what you are talking about. Because when he scores goals he looks like shit. But then when he plays well it’s Oo look zero points….so what is it? Tell me. Please for the love of god put together a thought that makes sense for someone who has watched hockey
Because I didn’t see you come on here everytime panarin was throwing blind passes or missing the net tonight…..it’s cool you have an agenda. It’s wrong but I’m proud of you for putting something down on here
Also if you think Harpur was good tonight….we’ll then idk if we were watching the same game
Here's my agenda. I don't
care if Panarin makes 50 bad passes if 25 of them end up as scoring chances while 15 of them end up with someone putting it in the net. The dude has made a career out of being a playmaker. High risk, high reward, right? We're paying the dude, so let him gatdamn pass. He produces. Period. I was
very critical of Panarin during the playoffs last season, but we wouldn't have been out of the 1st round if he didn't pot that big goal. My agenda is that if you're producing, then play your game. Everyone has bad/ordinary games, the love of your hockey life more than the usual.
Players that produce get more leniency from me than players who don't produce while their stans blame the organization, the coaches, Giuliani, the moon's ecliptic, before they even begin to think about putting some responsibility on Laf to better himself. However, you have
no trouble calling out kids from other teams that have holes in their games, even when those players are clearly levels above our one misfit.
Look, your obsession with Laf is unsettling. You got three votes for top players of the game, and I bet if you could, you'd use all three on Laf. Don't cry to me about agendas.