Sabre Dance
Make Hockey Fun Again
- Jul 27, 2006
- 12,456
- 2,243
You can't build a team of all 20 year olds. We need a couple older top 6 players.I don’t see Tkachuk or Lindhoms as targets with the focus Adams and company have right now.
You can't build a team of all 20 year olds. We need a couple older top 6 players.I don’t see Tkachuk or Lindhoms as targets with the focus Adams and company have right now.
I agree, but maybe they need to change focus a little bit if we can get players like Tkachuk and Lindholm and only getting B and C prospects in other deals.I don’t see Tkachuk or Lindhoms as targets with the focus Adams and company have right now.
What exactly would they sue the Sabres for? Jack has a contract.Terry hasn't assessed the differences between this and ROR (player can't suit up until a surgery is agreed upon, value will go down continually for that reason), and for that he's probably going to hang on to the player until it's a virtual emergency.
I say he moves for next to nothing in December after Jack tries to take the Sabres to court. It's going to be something ludicrously bad like that.
What exactly would they sue the Sabres for? Jack has a contract.
What exactly would they sue the Sabres for? Jack has a contract.
I say he moves for next to nothing in December after Jack tries to take the Sabres to court. It's going to be something ludicrously bad like that.
I'm sure a clever lawyer could find an argument that the result of giving medical decisions to the team is inhumane, and some clause in the cba could be interpreted to void the contract where the player is being medically abused or something in effect.Jack going to challenge the CBA, violating his basic human right to make his own decision on which NHL team to play for.
I’d love to get Tkachuk provided we could extent him before acquiring. But I don’t see Tkachuk or Lindholm as targets with the focus Adams and company have right now.
There will be exactly one 20 year old (Cozens) playing any meaningful minutes.You can't build a team of all 20 year olds. We need a couple older top 6 players.
I see your point, but I think Tkachuk would absolutely be on the radar. He's 23......and if we could lock him up to a reasonable(ish) 7 year deal, he'll grow right with the new core while still providing a high-level player right now.
I'd almost consider a 1-for-1 swap of the two. Maybe Calgary adds a conditional pick.
If I'm lookin at the acceptable Vegas model compSo what's a package from Calgary then?
2 of Zary/Coronato/Pelletier
Andersson or Valimaki
2022 1st round pick
Cap dump of some sort
That about right?
Gaudreau is almost useless in that situation as it's heavily rumored that he's only interested in Philly. Tkachuk is the same way in that he wants to hit UFA to go to STLGaudreau in a Calgary deal would be a nice idea for the Sabres from an asset management pov. He’s got one year left on his deal and then he’s a free agent. He could be flipped for a hell of a return with 50% retained.
I edited my post because of his modified NTC. If he didn’t have it he would be an interesting add as an asset to flip for even more stuff. But he’s not waiving to come here.Gaudreau is almost useless in that situation as it's heavily rumored that he's only interested in Philly. Tkachuk is the same way in that he wants to hit UFA to go to STL
Yes but his only going to sign with Philly rumors would cut into the quality of assets a team would be willing to give up.I edited my post because of his modified NTC. If he didn’t have it he would be an interesting add as an asset to flip for even more stuff.
Friedman reported that Vegas ask from us wasn’t accurate. Can’t remember if he elaborated on it. at this point I’m taking every report of a possible return with a gigantic grain of salt.If I'm lookin at the acceptable Vegas model comp
Krebs = Zary
Tuch > Dube
Hague < Andersson
VGK 1st < CGY 1st
wouldn't hate it if it came to that
Tkachuk/Lindholm arent coming here
I’m talking about a deadline deal for more picks in the next two drafts. I don’t see how where he would sign after the season would matter with that.Yes but his only going to sign with Philly rumors would cut into the quality of assets a team would be willing to give up.
Tkachuk extended + Zary. Do it Kyvyn.I see your point, but I think Tkachuk would absolutely be on the radar. He's 23......and if we could lock him up to a reasonable(ish) 7 year deal, he'll grow right with the new core while still providing a high-level player right now.
I'd almost consider a 1-for-1 swap of the two. Maybe Calgary adds a conditional pick.
yeah just goin by what we might be chasin from VegasFriedman reported that Vegas ask from us wasn’t accurate. Can’t remember if he elaborated on it. at this point I’m taking every report of a possible return with a gigantic grain of salt.
I’m all for acquiring Tkachuk if we could extend him long term before closing a trade.
I just think he’s on the outside edge of the age they’re looking for . He’s also due for a huge long term deal, something they may not be looking to do. You’d basically eat up almost all of Jack’s departing cap hit with a Tkachuk extension. I’d be cool with it but I don’t think the Sabres would be.
From the Calgary pov I would imagine the idea of adding Jack for them is about someone to pair with Tkachuk. They would anchor their top line which slots Gudreau/Monahan behind them. Gives them a shot at the playoffs and maybe more.