Fire Benning
diaper filled piss baby
Roughly PPG winger signed to an excellent contract, what is his value? Canucks have a massive organization need for young defensive roster players or prospects.
We also have a massive need for skilled forwards.... oh wait JT is one of our best!
Is Schmidt not good? I'm seriously not being facetious--I haven't watched the Canucks at all this year.This aint it, Chief.
Keep Petey, Hog, JT, Horvat and Boeser.
Schmidt & Myers are the guys I would be trying to clear for UFA season.
Is Schmidt not good? I'm seriously not being facetious--I haven't watched the Canucks at all this year.
No he has been the Canucks best defenseman imo. Him and Edler have been one of the defense pairings in the NHL.Is Schmidt not good? I'm seriously not being facetious--I haven't watched the Canucks at all this year.
No he has been the Canucks best defenseman imo. Him and Edler have been one of the defense pairings in the NHL.
Putting Schmidt and Myers in the same group is disrespectful to Schmidt.
Schmidt's been good, doesn't get enough credit.Is Schmidt not good? I'm seriously not being facetious--I haven't watched the Canucks at all this year.
Canucks have a massive organization need for young defensive roster players or prospects.
Ha Ha funny witty post.We also have a massive need for skilled forwards.... oh wait JT is one of our best!
Who do you think he could return in a 1 for 1 swap for a top 4 defenseman? Or maybe better yet who would you target?I don't think Miller is untouchable. He certainly could be moved for a quality top 4 defenceman on a good value cost controlled contract.
I think Miller could certainly use a shake up, but a demotion to the third line should provide that.
Honestly, haven't thought about it, but it's be a structural improvement to the team, and if moved before the expansion draft, there could be some good value players available who otherwise would not be.Who do you think he could return in a 1 for 1 swap for a top 4 defenseman? Or maybe better yet who would you target?
Does he not play C because you already have Horvat and Petersson, and don't want to play him at 3C? Because if he can play C, then he would be an improvement over Gaudette, wouldn't he?
He can play C and he is really good in the face off circle. However if the Canucks move him to #3C, then we officially have 1-1.5 top 6 wingers. Miller is far more valuable as a ppg 1st line winger than a 40 pt #3C.Does he not play C because you already have Horvat and Petersson, and don't want to play him at 3C? Because if he can play C, then he would be an improvement over Gaudette, wouldn't he?