LeafsOHLRangers98
Registered User
- Jun 13, 2017
- 6,577
- 6,724
Those first four names make a pretty good offseason shopping list ^^
Move Grichuk and Roark and extremely front loading on all 4 would be a tidy piece of business.
Those first four names make a pretty good offseason shopping list ^^
I agree get rid of Grich and Roark somehow.Move Grichuk and Roark and extremely front loading on all 4 would be a tidy piece of business.
Houston is losing all their OFs to FA in Springer, Brantley and Reddick. They also have Verlander on a 1 year deal worth 33M who is likely to miss most of the season. So they are spending 33M next season on nothing.
Houston has a need in the OF and in the rotation. Grichuk also is from Houston.
Would you guys trade Grichuk and Roark for Verlander and release Verlander?
Houston is close to the Luxury Tax and if Verlander is out they get 2 players that can actually play and save 11M in 2021.
Jays take on the 11M in 2021 to save 10M in 2022 and 2023 and get 2 roster spots. The extra 11M in 2021 will hurt the Jays but it’s short term pain for long term gain. The added benefit is that the Jays could replace Roark’s production at no additional cost with Kay or Thornton if needed and Grichuk’s with Fisher or someone on the market.
Would you trade Grichuk and Roark for Verlander 33M 2021 salary?
During that conversation, Guerrero revealed that he apologized to teammates for letting himself go during the pandemic shutdown, squandering the previous winter’s training (he’s since lost 32 pounds), acknowledged relying primarily on his abundant talent and said he’s been outperformed by peers like Juan Soto, Fernando Tatis Jr., and Ronald Acuna Jr., because of their off-season work.
Get it done without trading any of Vlad, Bo, Biggio, Teo, Jansen, Groshans, Martin, Pearson, or Ryu and I'm very happy. If Lourdes, Orlevis, SWR, Mahoah, or Kloff aren't involved either I'm over the f***ing moon.
I know Cleveland is being cheap and wants to cut money, but I wonder if they want to take money back (like Roark or Grichuk) to increase their haul or if they just straight up want to dump Lindor's money?
Yeah, you cut payroll during a rebuild for pretty much this exact moment. Have to capitalize.I'm getting increasingly excited about the potential of this offseason. Very few teams (if any) can match our prospect pool and amount of money available to spend. Every report is saying how aggressive we plan to be.
This could very well be a make or break offseason for this FO. They HAVE to take advantage of all these teams attempting to cut salary.
I'm surprised more people don't have Lourdes on the untouchables list. While Lindor is better then Gurriel Jr. there's a lot of players I would move before him.
Batted.308
Has big time power
Was just a finalist for the Gold glove award
He's turning into a complete 2-way guy. By two-way I'm talking about a guy who can play both offence and defence. He keeps getting better defensively.
Averaged 3.4 FWAR over his last 162 games.
We're short on outfielders.
and he's on a steal of a contract giving us more money to sign good players.
He's one of the last players I would want to trade behind the 4 or 5 big studs.
Orelvis, SWR, Monoah, Kloff, Pardhino can be used for Lindor. Maybe Tellez/Grichcuk as well as part of a package although that would suck moving Tellez I'd prefer giving up futures. I may move Groshans before Gurriel honestly although I'd have to think about it more
I love Gurriel. I think he has turned into a fantastic OF, but if Cleveland said to me "Gurriel has to be included or this isn't happening" I'd be willing to pack up Gurriel's bags myself. Don't forget that he's older than Lindor. In no way do I want to trade him, I just don't see him as an untouchable (like I see Bo, Biggio, Vlad, Teo, etc) if a team is willing to give us gigantic value for him.
The first group I had is essentially my untouchables (plus Jansen, who I think is so so close to being the 2nd best catcher in baseball). The second group is the guys that if forced, I'd trade. In no way do I want to trade any of them.