CapitalsCupReality
It’s Go Time!!
- Feb 27, 2002
- 64,729
- 19,597
I saw Green make two phenomenal plays on one shift, one in the D zone, then in the O. He also made multiple nice defensive plays tonight. Way to put it together Greenie!
Relying on 3 question marks is logical!? It's like everyone already forgot what a young inexperienced 3rd pair did for us last year.
Sorry, not how you stay employed if you're a GM with Cup aspirations.
I saw Green make two phenomenal plays on one shift, one in the D zone, then in the O. He also made multiple nice defensive plays tonight. Way to put it together Greenie!
Who is the question mark there? Orlov could play long ago. He didn't because of cap, and the mess with it thanks to McPhee. Guy got some injury concerns but he's still the best bet to subst Orpik as top-4 LD then the latter is done. From the system, of course.
Orlov's injury concerns are there but I wouldn't say that it's worse than Green's or Orpik's.
Then get back to my comment. I said Carrick/Bowey are injury replacement for Orlov/otherD. Which is perfectly fine in regular season, in my opinion.
Other D (3LD) could be Schmidt. And then you can have Gleason-type at deadline, just as we did this year.
So the only difference between this year and my plan for the next is Green->out and Orlov->in. From the cap standpoint it's a good plan.
Just wait and see how Orlov becomes good defenseman under the wing of Orpik and Karl Langway.
He got a couple of games in Hershey and then was restricted to practice only because of the cap.
I don't think he isn't healthy.
Was Tom Poti finished when Dr. txpd said he was?
Was John Erskine finished when Dr. txpd said he was?
Is Dmitri Orlov not coming back this year because Dr. txpd says he isn't?
Erskine played in the preseason after you summarily dismissed his chances of playing on NHL ice ever again. You can nuance your question as much as you want, but you were wrong again.
Why would the organization risk playing Orlov at "50-60% of standard", whatever that even means? If you think the organization prefers Schmidt at this point, that's fine. Anything else is your standard mumbo-jumbo regarding injuries.
I'll give you credit for not giving up though, no matter how many times you've been proven wrong in the past.
I think its very likely they prefer Orlov but haven't had a chance to prove it to fans because he got injured as Trotz took over.
Sure the like Schmidt a lot but who do we think is consensus rated higher as a prospect?
Maybe some have forgotten how Orlov looked in his last 20 games in DC. I don't think BMac has.
I have the two pretty darn close to even honestly at this stage. Slight edges could be given to both in certain categories.
The problem with him is that his injury has only returned 50-60% of standard.
You are probably right but these 7/8 types often just drift away... Schultz... Schilling.... Shh
Orlov looked fantastic a year ago. Maybe he stopped listening to Oates, or took it upon himself to show us his tools with the puck, but I was really looking forward to him under Trotz. I still am more than ever looking at how aggressive he has our Dmen.
I am tentatively penciling him into our 3RD slot for next year, paired up with Gleeskine.
I'm sorry but you know this how exactly? Where did you get that number from? There is definitely video of Orlov taking slapshots in practice from a few months ago that at least seem close to 100% to my eyes.
He looked good, but I'm not gushing over him as much to say FANTASTIC. I could certainly see the SchGleelov trio rotating the 3rd pair next year.
It's a swag of course, sort of like you saying he's close to 100% taking slappers. I doubt you had a radar gun with before and after speeds right? Tex needs to start building in disclaimer language, like "probably or I suspect".
Fantastic = Red Koolaid perhaps and it was a small sample size, but something clicked. A light switch was thrown. He had just been more a steady eddie here, no PP time, and yet we all know he had as many offensive skills as anyone not named Green.
He never got the green light to bring it. I remember him dangling around defenders, basically putting on puck possession clinics at times.
I cannot be the only one that was impressed. Cannot!
I said seems because obviously I don't know and I'm not going to pretend to know for certain.
I believe his point is, Orlov isn't ready.