elmeroil
Registered User
- Feb 3, 2013
- 1,884
- 2,952
Koskinen looked good, I wonder if there is a chance he gets the start tomorrow? My guess is no but that's 2 good games in a row he has played vs the Avs
Ok, it's both an atrocious call and not the reason the team lost. We're all aware of this, but it's still an absolutely atrocious call.considering the gift the Oilers got with the Coleman goal being called back last series, you shouldn't be bitching too much about some bad luck with the refs this game. Win some, lose some.
Maybe instead the Oilers should just play better. Give up 7 or 8 goals, you deserve to lose.
I think Smith will still start, but I think that leash is short given Koskinen's performance.Koskinen looked good, I wonder if there is a chance he gets the start tomorrow? My guess is no but that's 2 good games in a row he has played vs the Avs
How about not telling people what they can and can't do? I am not in here belly aching even though I have my opinions, but it grinds me when people start trying to moderate what others can and can't debate. You have been around long enough to know this, fellow OG'er.It was a delayed offside. All there is to it. Stop complaining and move on. Can’t make fun of flames fans if you can’t get past this call.
We will. Game 1's have always been a feel-in for the Oilers. Now we know what they are up against, they will beat them.Please win, Oilers
That is true but I dont think it will be sustainable. I know they will put Smith in but he has to have a short leash.3 goals is fine. The lowest amount we’ve scored in the last 6 games is 4 LOL.
If you go with smith, I think he has a very short leash.Koskinen looked good, I wonder if there is a chance he gets the start tomorrow? My guess is no but that's 2 good games in a row he has played vs the Avs
it was refpuck for sure. altered the outcome of the game, but overall the Oilers did well and showed that they can out gun the Avs in a fair fight. If smith can settle in or if Kosko is ready to go on a heater, the Oilers will win this in 5-6 games."If, during the course of the delayed off-side, any member of the attacking team touches the puck, attempts to gain possession of a loose puck, forces the defending puck carrier further back into his own zone, or who is about to make physical contact with the defending puck carrier, the Linesman shall stop play for the off-side violation."
The possession part is the stinky part of the call. If you really want to argue he didn't have possession for the split second the guy was offside, how can you argue he wasn't attempting to gain possession of it instead?
You’re… defending people just sitting here griping on the internet, being complete hypocrites and ignorant of the rules? Weird post dude.How about not telling people what they can and can't do? I am not in here belly aching even though I have my opinions, but it grinds me when people start trying to moderate what others can and can't debate. You have been around long enough to know this, fellow OG'er.
You’re… defending people just sitting here griping on the internet, being complete hypocrites and ignorant of the rules? Weird post dude.
Any person who mocked the flames fans for being upset about the Coleman goal have zero right to complain about this. This was much less controversial, once you have it explained.
Indeed its depressing how the officials talked themselves into this call. They were so swayed by some odd interpretation that superceded what puck control is in hockey. This isn't lacrosse, the ball isn't contained in a net. STicks and pucks are not magnetic. Puck control has meant in control of the object (not necessarily touching the object) since hockey was first described. Suddenly they change this interpretation. Like I said in GDT stickhandling is puck control. Most of the time in such a sequence puck is not in contact with stick yet its control. When a basketball is dribbling a ball he's in control. Makar had clear control of the puck there. Control has never meant blade has to be in continual contact with puck.The puck was never more than a couple of inches off the stick. If that is the new interpretation of the rule they have just made this an almost impossible rule to enforce.
Lmao, not even remotely the same thing.considering the gift the Oilers got with the Coleman goal being called back last series, you shouldn't be bitching too much about some bad luck with the refs this game. Win some, lose some.
Maybe instead the Oilers should just play better. Give up 7 or 8 goals, you deserve to lose.
It was a contrived call for whatever reason - afraid of backlash from the home crowd?Indeed its depressing how the officials talked themselves into this call. They were so swayed by some odd interpretation that superceded what puck control is in hockey. This isn't lacrosse, the ball isn't contained in a net. STicks and pucks are not magnetic. Puck control has meant in control of the object (not necessarily touching the object) since hockey was first described. Suddenly they change this interpretation. Like I said in GDT stickhandling is puck control. Most of the time in such a sequence puck is not in contact with stick yet its control. When a basketball is dribbling a ball he's in control. Makar had clear control of the puck there. Control has never meant blade has to be in continual contact with puck.
Smith was pulled at 6 goals. Not the only time. The leash is never tight with him and its high time for the coach to finally say no to his will to start games. At this moment he's clearly the 2nd or worse best option in net. He did his time, got us through a string. Its clear to me that Smith has hit a wall, and that it doesn't always look good once that occurs. This is not like playing one bad game to start the Flames series. Smith was poor in games 4, 5 against Calgary and I tend to support Smith all day usually.Ok, it's both an atrocious call and not the reason the team lost. We're all aware of this, but it's still an absolutely atrocious call.
I think Smith will still start, but I think that leash is short given Koskinen's performance.
The leash is long cause the teams trust is so low in Koskinen that Koskinen has already apparently signed in Europe.Smith was pulled at 6 goals. Not the only time. The leash is never tight with him and its high time for the coach to finally say no to his will to start games. At this moment he's clearly the 2nd or worse best option in net. He did his time, got us through a string. Its clear to me that Smith has hit a wall, and that it doesn't always look good once that occurs. This is not like playing one bad game to start the Flames series. Smith was poor in games 4, 5 against Calgary and I tend to support Smith all day usually.