Not many. But then again, many of those who haven't are smart enough to refrain from saying this dude is better than Phaneuf.
Monster Bertuzz is right. The Canadian blueline is star-studded and Phaneuf is a shoe-in. But somehow we're supposed to believe Johnson is already better than him when he doesn't make the USA team?
By listening to someone who has never seen him play?
Someone who goes off the talk of others, who most probably heard it from someone else too?
You see where I'm going with this? At what point do we begin to talk about the stuff we know about and shut our ****ing traps about the stuff we don't know?