Mount Suribachi
Registered User
We are all disappointed with Holland and the buck stops with him.
But is it fair to ask at this point is Mike Babcock's lack of a contract, swirling rumors in terms of his coaching future hurting this team?
I mean surely the big crowd of major Babcock supporters would argue his being the bench boss should be a big selling point right?
He was willing to fly around and meet people in the past, not much heard on that front recently.
We have gone on about the lengths of what appears to be a growing disconnect between him and his boss who is persona non grata for his stunning decision to panic and bring Quincey back and then loyally sign Cleary.
But we had options up the list first if we are to believe some of what has been floated out there and we offered them things that should have been desirable. Did Babcock's contract status hurt us in your opinion and how worried should we be if this is an opinion of NHL players because that would be some additional smoke to the idea he is leaving soon.
I think its the other way round. The scraps that Holland keeps providing Babcock with will make Babcock leave. The thought of Babcock coaching the Pens and teaching/forcing Crosby and Malkin to play defence terrifies me.
Babcock has repeatedly talked about the need for more toughness, so Holland provides him with borderline NHLers like May and Tootoo and friggin Norton. He's preached the need for RHDs and Holland provides him with...no-one. He's complained about the lack of high-end talent on the roster and Holland provides him with....no-one.
I've thought for several years (even whilst I was still a Holland defender) that coach and GM are on different pages. I will be amazed if Babcock signs an extension with Detroit. If I'm him I wait till after the playoffs and have my choice of which talented but underachieving team to go to.