- Dec 2, 2007
- 17,275
- 2,233
A #3 with some upside still there to be realized is about what I expect us to get. Both those are the guys with borderline #2 potential, not bonafied 2nd pairing guys. Heck, Schultz isn't even a 2nd pairing guy.
We could probably nab Meszaros for an insignificant asset, he's pretty close to a 2nd pairing guy when healthy.
Stastny and O'Reilly are not expendable assets, they are the type of complimentary pieces that create a LAK cup dynamic. You only move them if you're given a home run deal, like JJ for Carter, strength for a weakness of similar caliber.
O'Reilly for Kulikov perhaps or JJ maybe. Stastny isn't going to get us a reasonable enough return, might as well re-sign him and get him used to playing C/LW.
Quite doable if one plays full time wing.
Stastny - Duchene - XXX
XXXXXX - MacKinnon - XXX
Landeskog - O'Reilly -XXX
We roll each line 18-20 minutes a piece, 4th line gets 5-8 depending on the game situation. You can afford to pay Stastny 5-6 mil if he's successful on the wing and center. You can afford to pay O'Reilly 5-5.5 mil if he's getting enough icetime and playing #1 PK effectively, when Mack gets his big raise you consider moving Stastny or O'Reilly for a younger, cheaper piece or reallocate their money towards defense.
Cross that bridge if we get there, assume for now he will and act accordingly. He's not someone you make a panic move on.
We could probably nab Meszaros for an insignificant asset, he's pretty close to a 2nd pairing guy when healthy.
Stastny and O'Reilly are not expendable assets, they are the type of complimentary pieces that create a LAK cup dynamic. You only move them if you're given a home run deal, like JJ for Carter, strength for a weakness of similar caliber.
O'Reilly for Kulikov perhaps or JJ maybe. Stastny isn't going to get us a reasonable enough return, might as well re-sign him and get him used to playing C/LW.
An excellent question, one which rises above the tactical discussion of this-for-that.
And it's a question that begs a few complex discussions. Can a team really have 4 1st/2nd line centers on it at the same time? Given one of these centers will be possibly/likely lost for nothing in 9 months, should they get what they can?
Quite doable if one plays full time wing.
Stastny - Duchene - XXX
XXXXXX - MacKinnon - XXX
Landeskog - O'Reilly -XXX
We roll each line 18-20 minutes a piece, 4th line gets 5-8 depending on the game situation. You can afford to pay Stastny 5-6 mil if he's successful on the wing and center. You can afford to pay O'Reilly 5-5.5 mil if he's getting enough icetime and playing #1 PK effectively, when Mack gets his big raise you consider moving Stastny or O'Reilly for a younger, cheaper piece or reallocate their money towards defense.
...and if Stastny won't resign before the deadline, then what?
Cross that bridge if we get there, assume for now he will and act accordingly. He's not someone you make a panic move on.