hockeyfish
Registered User
Can Hayes be signed right now? Or when?
I know we can't sign him, but can we even talk to him? Seems like we might have been high on his list of preferred destinations rather than us being actual suitors.
Can Hayes be signed right now? Or when?
It's not even about whether Briere will or won't play on the 4th line. It's that the Avs didn't talk him into waiving his NMC by offering him a better opportunity than Montreal gave him, and are now planning on letting Hayes push him down onto the 4th line.
The only way Hayes likes the Avs over the Hawks is if he's not at all worried about making a healthy line up this year in the top 9, and isn't looking for for much more assurances than the Hawks can give him in year two.
The Hawks will have to do something to swallow Toews and Kane's contracts. There will be just as big an opportunity as you can expect on the Avs.
O'Reilly - Duchene - Iginla
Landeskog - MacKinnon - Hayes
McGinn - Briere - Tanguay
Talbot - Mitchell - Winchester
With less than 3M of cap space available and Barrie still unsigned, how are we supposed to afford Hayes?
The cost of his ELC would be reimbursed by sending someone else to LE.
With less than 3M of cap space available and Barrie still unsigned, how are we supposed to afford Hayes?
Such as?
I don't know who, Bordy? Someone. Doesn't matter from a money standpoint because ELC is what max 925k and a team can write off up to 925k salary by sending them down so it's a wash.
That 3rd line has the potential to be the most productive 3rd line in the whole league. Even the 4th line is impressive. That's quite a lineup right there.
I can pretty much guarantee we did not offer him a 3rd line role. You dont make promises you cant live up to. And there is no way we play Briere over someone that is better. He probably just wanted out of Montreal and we were the only possibility. He probably did not even fell like he would get an opportunity to even compete for a higher role in Montreal. That Im sure we promised- a chance to compete.
As for Chicago, look at their prospect pool. They are quite loaded. These are the guys Hayes will be competing with. And then look at ours. Hishon, who has major injury concerns. Bleackley, who is only 18. And a couple European wildcards.
Ew definitely not Bordy. Wilson, Cliche, Noreau, and Guenin for me. Those are the most useless guys for me. Maybe not Noreau but I'd prefer giving Elliott a shot over him.
WIth all due respect, I don't think you can guarantee that.
"Pretty much". Basically, anything short of an actual guarantee. It would just be straight stupid to promise a bigger role to some washed up player. You let them know that they will have ever chance to earn the biggest role they possibly can and that the younger guys or "managements guys" won't get special treatment. But you certainly don't promise any sort of playing time.
Promise, assurance , call it whatever you want. We are talking about the same thing.
"He will find his way onto the 4th line"? Your entire argument is that he will be the 3rd line RW and Hayes has no chance at surpassing him. So which is it? Is he set on the 3rd line or can he be passed by someone better?
And how exactly do you know why Briere waived his no trade clause? You talk about this as of its a fact.
Ew definitely not Bordy.
That's kind of a problem actually. I see a lot of healthy scratch candidates this year.