WHAT is everyone's pre-occupation with Couturier?
By far the most overrated under-21 player in the NHL.
Plus that doesn't solve our center situation because you're giving up Kadri as well.
I wouldn't trade Jake for anything, but Nonis will for sure.
I'd trade anyone else, Rielly, Biggs, Percy, Colborne, Finn, but not gardiner. Carlyle is being a huge **** about him, all he needs is another full season to shine.
What are we getting back?
If it's a player that's already elite at their position like Letang, sure. If it's a sideways move for a project centre like Couturier, no thanks.
for a player like Letang? no. i think gards will be a better player in his prime then Letang is now. too much of a gamble to take.
for a player like Letang? no. i think gards will be a better player in his prime then Letang is now. too much of a gamble to take.
RNH is a future star #1 centre. Mark my words
Wow, I'm surprised he's only 6'2"; are Boston forwards a bunch of midgets? It was definitely #51 tho and that's Gardiner.
I'd have guessed 6'4", no lie. Sorry for that. I think the question is still fair though; why does your coach hate him so much? I really thought he looked like an amazing player. Was he awful the whole year and just had a few good games against Boston or something?
okay so what? You're giving up on two potential great players in Gardiner, and Kadri, PLUS our 1st rnd pick in what is supposed to be a very deep draft.
say we do it:
JVR - RNH - KESSEL
Lupul - Grabo? - kulemin
mac - colborne - ??
orr - mcclement - maclaren
Phaneuf - gunnar
Franson - ????
Fraser - Liles
By filling 1 hole, you've opened up two major ones plus gave away our 1st.
Also RNH isn't a star just yet.
Gardiner + 1st + mid prospect would be more like it.
RNH is a future star #1 centre. Mark my words
Our coach doesn't hate him and don't listen to anyone who suggests that. Because of the lockout, Gardiner started the year playing for the Marlies where he suffered a concussion. When he was ready to return, he was eventually brought up to the Leafs but he was struggling and it was felt that he needed more time with the Marlies for conditioning purposes so he was sent back down. When they finally felt he was ready, he returned, had a great comeback game but slowly fell off the radar due to poor defensive mistakes. He ended up getting scratched for a number of games and I think was scratched for game 1 of the playoffs. Carlyle made it clear that Gardiner needed to pay more attention to his defence. After game 1, Carlyle realize that the Leafs needed to utilize an obvious strength over the Bruins which was their skating so as a result, Gardiner and Liles (offensive minded D that are great skaters) were put into the line-up. Gardiner pretty much went beast mode in the playoffs and not just with his offensive chances but he was making great defensive plays. I can assure you, that the Gardiner you saw was easily the best Gardiner has ever played and it was a reminder to all of us of the kind of special player he can be.
Carlyle finally played Gardiner because of injuries. All coaches make mistakes, like every other person, and Randy was downright moronic in his treatment of Gardiner this year
RNH is a future star #1 centre. Mark my words
Carlyle finally played Gardiner because of injuries. All coaches make mistakes, like every other person, and Randy was downright moronic in his treatment of Gardiner this year
Who was injured that got Gardiner back in the line-up?
I think Gardiner on a bad day is more useful than Kostka or O'Byrne but Gardiner wasn't playing like he had undoubtedly 'earned' a spot on the roster. If you think so, then we have different ideas of what is expected of a d-man.
There's more than one way to look at the situation. The Leafs didn't NEED Gardiner to win games. They were winning games while he was out injured, playing with the Marlies and sitting in the press box therefore there was no reason to play him at all costs. Maybe the conditions for getting back into the line-up wasn't about being the better option because of injuries or because all the other options suck, maybe it was about showing the commitment and making strides in the areas he was told he needs to work on. Maybe Carlyle felt that a young and inexperienced player needed to learn how to earn his way back into a line-up rather than handing him the spot.
You may not disagree with that but then again, you aren't an NHL coach so your opinion (and mine) means very little to the reality of the situation.