expy
Registered User
- Nov 2, 2010
- 15,408
- 16,535
None of those also get 1st PP time.Still he's not our worst forward.
Armia, Pitlick, Dudonov, Pez and Evans all have worst ppg rates.
None of those also get 1st PP time.Still he's not our worst forward.
Armia, Pitlick, Dudonov, Pez and Evans all have worst ppg rates.
The OP said with thoughI said no-nmc no-ntc...
None, otherwise it would be pointless indeed
The OP said with though
Yeah, but i'm not the OP. We can discuss alternatives, can't we?
I think adding a nmc/ntc defeats the whole purpose of re-signing him for cheap, as I don't want him for anything more than trade fodder to get picks next year and he gets to upgrade his stock if he's motivated enough. Win/win. If it takes a nmc/ntc to convince him, then it's a no-go for me.
This is what happens, when you play for the name on the back, and not the crest on the front.Why don't "we" just trade him at this year's deadline then? I doubt he'll have more value next deadline versus this one. His stats show decline on an annual basis.
Honestly, let's say Bergervin was smart (I know, long shot. Fake news) and gave Drouin a "show me" contract when he traded for him. Lets say two years. Would he have earned a second contract?This is what happens, when you play for the name on the back, and not the crest on the front.
Bergevin totally misjudged this kid, and Stevie Y knew better, and fleeced him.
Expiration date is up.................................
Why don't "we" just trade him at this year's deadline then? I doubt he'll have more value next deadline versus this one. His stats show decline on an annual basis.
Because we have better trade baits to retain on this year and can only retain on three contracts. Drouin's salary this year is a massive hurdle as trade bait. At 750k, not so much.
And as I previously said, a Drouin at 750k will have no more pressure and expectations. Some people strive under high pressure and expectations, while others perform better when they are free from those. I believe Drouin is the latter.
It's a no cost gamble that could have a nice pay off.
you never give up, attacking player , attacking fans ...Unlike YOU..................it doesn't matter where a kid is born, I cheer for the Habs.
You are the one who is not being honest...............and should use your mirror. I call out all the lazy players, which is why Drouin is a target............I call out me me me players, which is why Danault was a target....Growing up and watching the Habs, Lemaire, Cournoyer and Lafleur and Dryden were my favorite payers so you can shove your theory you know where.
You have ZERO credibility with me....................no worries, your boy is on his way to the Land of Oz very soon, I hope he can find what he is looking for there.
Cheers.
i don't think he has recovered from 3 wrist surgeries and one ankle surgery in 4 years... people tend to conveniently forget that stuff.He's healthy now, not putting up points, and will not get the Habs anything at the TDL. Why will next season be different?
Unfortunately, Bergevin would still have been the GM, so he would have been re-signed -- and "earned" would not have been part of the equation.Honestly, let's say Bergervin was smart (I know, long shot. Fake news) and gave Drouin a "show me" contract when he traded for him. Lets say two years. Would he have earned a second contract?
If he hasn't recovered in four years, then he's done and one more year isn't going to make a difference.i don't think he has recovered from 3 wrist surgeries and one ankle surgery in 4 years... people tend to conveniently forget that stuff.
he's had a surgery each year. we don't know if one year will make a difference, we aren't doctors. When he's healthy he produces, unless the team is in the toilet then he doesn't put himself at risk. I think someone will roll the dice on him at the deadline anyway. He's a cheap gamble and can play in the top 6 on a skill team.Unfortunately, Bergevin would still have been the GM, so he would have been re-signed -- and "earned" would not have been part of the equation.
If he hasn't recovered in four years, then he's done and one more year isn't going to make a difference.
Put me on ignore............you never give up, attacking player , attacking fans ...
I am here to share opinion with others that also have an opinion. Not to read emptiness comments
" this player is lazy, this other is me me me" " That's why they are my target" .
Yeah, nothing can be more appropriate to describe your attitude ; you want a target , someone to attack, to insult
Just stop to quote me, stop to answer my posts or the ones of people talking to me.
I don't want to read your bad comments , your attacks, the dots....................... that you put everywhere in your posts. I like to read or share constructive and positive comments, not annoying , destructive attacks , so bye
Have a good end of evening
The show me contract, would have shown nothing................Honestly, let's say Bergervin was smart (I know, long shot. Fake news) and gave Drouin a "show me" contract when he traded for him. Lets say two years. Would he have earned a second contract?
Unfortunately, Bergevin would still have been the GM, so he would have been re-signed -- and "earned" would not have been part of the equation.
If he hasn't recovered in four years, then he's done and one more year isn't going to make a difference.
Actually, the Habs do not have three better trade baits to retain on this season, IMO. There are four pending UFA on the roster -- Drouin, Dadanov, Monahan and Byron. Right now, unless Monahan gets and remains healthy, the most attractive of those four may actually be Byron. A team up against the cap could send the Habs a player under contract plus a pick/prospect in order to use his LTIR space. No salary retention would be needed in such a case.Because we have better trade baits to retain on this year and can only retain on three contracts. Drouin's salary this year is a massive hurdle as trade bait. At 750k, not so much.
And as I previously said, a Drouin at 750k will have no more pressure and expectations. Some people strive under high pressure and expectations, while others perform better when they are free from those. I believe Drouin is the latter.
It's a no cost gamble that could have a nice pay off.
Honestly, let's say Bergervin was smart (I know, long shot. Fake news) and gave Drouin a "show me" contract when he traded for him. Lets say two years. Would he have earned a second contract?
If you are tanking again next season......then extend DrouinA thought came to my mind, if Drouin's agent said to the Habs that Drouin is desperate to make it work and pay back the faith the Habs and Habs fans placed in him -- it would be a PR and goodwill coup for both Drouin and the Habs (and possibly give Drouin another shot to extend his NHL career) -- would the Habs accept? Should the Habs accept?
Why or why not?
For your information he has 0 goals, 5 assists in 18 games this season (on pace for 23pts in an 82 game season). He had 20pts in 34gp last season. In his best seasons as a Hab he had 46 and 53 points.
He would have been an RFA at the end of the deal for one. Secondly, Drouin put up decent numbers in his time in Montreal prior to this year. He absolutely would have been given another contract.Honestly, let's say Bergervin was smart (I know, long shot. Fake news) and gave Drouin a "show me" contract when he traded for him. Lets say two years. Would he have earned a second contract?
I think he continues. He’ll try another team or two.He has 33 million reasons to walk away and will probably retire at season's end. He barely plays now so why would he want to prolong this any further?