This.
People who don’t do the math (or can’t) always use this argument against players and it’s a really bad one. If one doubled Lemieux’s 1990’s games played of 318 to 636 and also gave him just 1 PPG (which is absolutely ludicrous to consider lol) in those extra 318 games, he would still sit comfortably on top of the list in that decade with a 1.53 PPG.
I frequently argue against giving players extra credit if they didn’t play the games, but for anyone to pretend that someone like Lemieux wasn’t far ahead of every forward who ever played other than Gretzky is a joke. There’s nothing misleading about his numbers. He’s one of the few players ever where I don’t doubt that given an extra 500 games, his per game stats would barely decline.