He was still considered the best goalie in the AHL for yearsMcIntyre won 0, so that's already happened.
He was still considered the best goalie in the AHL for yearsMcIntyre won 0, so that's already happened.
Nadda, that's McBackup. Sparks has a cool .893 sv% and a 37.5 win% at the NHL level.
Of course those NHL numbers are from more than 2 years ago. McBackup's numbers from that same season are worse than Sparks' (who played 1 fewer game) were - despite Sparks playing on the worst team in the NHL.
But, it wouldn't make any sense to have Sparks as the backup after posting bad pre-season numbers. They haven't chosen a backup with numbers that bad since McElhinney a year ago (when his numbers were much worse that Sparks has ever put up).
Why is Andersen-Sparks leading the poll? Do Leaf fans here not know how to judge goalies?
McBackup is the best short-term backup but Picard deserves the long-term look for down the road. In an either/or situation, I'd drop Sparks and keep Picard. Between Pickard and McBackup, I'd give Pickard a bunch of starts and let him have some consistency (of games). Then go by that. Like other fans have said, Pickard showed in Colorado he can play and that was a pretty bad team then. Sparks continues to fail and he is only getting by on a good AHL team but he won't be able to cut it in the NHL - not now and maybe he won't be able to, period. The Leafs would be crazy to once again tire out Andersen with 60+ starts plus playoffs.
But then McBackup went out and played absolutely phenominal at the NHL level. Proving he can play at the NHL level. And he's ours.
Sparks?
Not so much.
Great AHL goalie...had a shot to prove he was something more and choked. That's not our fault. That's all on him.
Even his third period he said he played great last night, he still chucked the puck up the middle and gave it away twice.
Nope.
Sparks is not the answer right now.
Right. So McBackup completely sucked in 2015-16 but the Leafs gave him a chance and he played well. Then McBackup completely sucked in the 2017 preseason, but the Leafs gave him a chance and he played really well. So poor performance in 2015-16 and a poor performance in the preseason doesn't meant the Leafs will not give that goalie a chance - they have done so and were rewarded for doing so.
But now because Sparks sucked in 2015-16 (but not as much as McBackup did). and because Sparks has now sucked this preseason (but not as much as McBackup did last preseason) the Leafs shouldn't give him a chance.
I think that the Leafs will take McBackup. I am betting chances are pretty good he returns to the mean and sucks badly this season. I don't think that the Leafs will take Sparks. I am betting that he is picked up on waivers, returns to level he showed last season, while adjusting for higher competition at the NHL level, and has a better season than McBackup.
I don't really care either way.
Let’s consult the NHL/NHLPA collective bargaining agreement to work through what this scenario might look like. The relevant section on waivers can be found on page 71:
13.2 The “Playing Season Waiver Period” shall begin on the twelfth (12th) day prior to the start of the Regular Season and end on the day following the last day of a Club’s Playing Season. Subject to the provisions of this Article, the rights to the services of a Player may be Loaned to a club of another league, upon fulfillment of the following conditions, except when elsewhere expressly prohibited:
(a) Regular Waivers were requested and cleared during the Playing Season Waiver Period; and
(b) the Player has not played in ten (10) or more NHL Games cumulative since Regular Waivers on him were last cleared, and more than thirty (30) days cumulative on an NHL roster have not passed since Regular Waivers on him were last cleared.
What this tells us is that McElhinney could play as many as nine games for the Leafs after clearing waivers without having to pass through them again while being moved back and forth from the AHL. The cumulative days on an NHL roster isn’t as much of a concern in this case since the team’s affiliate is based a couple kilometres away in the same city.
As a result, McElhinney could theoretically practise and play with the Marlies to stay sharp and then be called up the same day the Leafs want or need him to make a start. Sparks would serve as Frederik Andersen’s backup in the interim.
It would buy more time for management and the coaching staff to make an evaluation on Sparks at the NHL level. That seems like a sensible approach given the 25-year-old’s track record. It’s certainly more sensible than making any firm conclusions after watching him allow eight goals on 48 shots in his last 90 minutes 50 seconds of pre-season play.
Sparks at the NHL level in 2018 is showing the same tendencies he did 3 years ago. He plays too erratic in the crease and he has always had a bad habit of falling to his belly and exposing the upper half of the net. He cant get away with that with the skill level in the NHL. Players are too patient and will just wait him out, as we've seen from his last two games. You want your goalie to stay upright and square to the puck at all times.Right. So McBackup completely sucked in 2015-16 but the Leafs gave him a chance and he played well. Then McBackup completely sucked in the 2017 preseason, but the Leafs gave him a chance and he played really well. So poor performance in 2015-16 and a poor performance in the preseason doesn't meant the Leafs will not give that goalie a chance - they have done so and were rewarded for doing so.
But now because Sparks sucked in 2015-16 (but not as much as McBackup did). and because Sparks has now sucked this preseason (but not as much as McBackup did last preseason) the Leafs shouldn't give him a chance.
I think that the Leafs will take McBackup. I am betting chances are pretty good he returns to the mean and sucks badly this season. I don't think that the Leafs will take Sparks. I am betting that he is picked up on waivers, returns to level he showed last season, while adjusting for higher competition at the NHL level, and has a better season than McBackup.
I don't really care either way.
Why is the goalie talk a two horse race? What about Pickard?
Seems he’s had the better preseason, has a larger body of work in the NHL, including the play on Team NA at the WHC.
Pickard has always seemed like a bonafide starter and Sparks is a bit of a long shot.
If you forget that Sparks has that shutout in his debut... is he really all that special?
Why is the goalie talk a two horse race? What about Pickard?
Seems he’s had the better preseason, has a larger body of work in the NHL, including the play on Team NA at the WHC.
Pickard has always seemed like a bonafide starter and Sparks is a bit of a long shot.
If you forget that Sparks has that shutout in his debut... is he really all that special?
Huge moment in the game. Beauty pass by Kessel. Shortly thereafter, AM34 scores #40
No matter what McElhinney does from here on, I'll always love him for this.
No. Nothing substantial if that's what you're thinking about.Do you think Sparks is trade-able for another prospect / pick?