God Says No
Registered User
- Mar 16, 2012
- 8,531
- 1,900
Michalek - Spezza - Stone
MacArthur - Turris - Stafford
Hoffman - Zibanejad - Ryan
Greening - Smith - Neil/Kassian
Not bad, but I'd rather have Conacher in there instead of Stafford.
Michalek - Spezza - Stone
MacArthur - Turris - Stafford
Hoffman - Zibanejad - Ryan
Greening - Smith - Neil/Kassian
Michalek - Spezza - Stone
MacArthur - Turris - Stafford
Hoffman - Zibanejad - Ryan
Greening - Smith - Neil/Kassian
Give your head a shake. In no way is Conacher or any other young player "standing in the way" of Hoffman. It is there for Hoffman to take and the last callup he had two full games alongside Mac and Turris and he didn't perform. How are players standing in his way ? You seem to be assuming a lot that Hoffman or Prince or Stone can make the jump. Hoffman has passed through waivers this year after an excellent year last year. Are all 29 clubs blind to this "hidden gem" ? I hope Hoffman excels this time up but he needs to do something quick because he is running out of opportunities. My biggest hope is he gets al least a dozen games to show what he's got.
Lol, where did Hoffman/Conacher comparison come from? Hoffman is 6'0 vs 5'8 Conacher.
They don't even play the same.
3rd line*
We won't go anywhere with Greening-Smith-Neil as our 3rd line.
While I don't disagree Hoffman has to make the most of his opportunities, however if two games with zero production is the measure, then Conacher would have been out of town long ago along with many Sens forwards!!!
My apologies but I dislike when players are evaluated by different standards.
It would be just as easy to suggest if Hoffman had the opportunity to play 57 games with little fear of being sent to Bingo he would most likely have more than 20 points.
Smith is now on the 4th line with Neil, Condra and Greening are now on line 1 and 2.
Wonder how far this will take the Sens!!!!
Your reading me wrong, he had the proper opportunity with the proper players but I absolutely agree he wasn't given enough time. He needs an extended audition, my point was Conacher is not standing in the way of any players opportunities. To me he is being pushed aside once again while Condra and greening get to play on the top two lines! and Cony draws Smith and Neil. NOT evaluating players by different standards at all, I continue to complain about our younger players not getting the proper opportunity due to MacLeans infatuation with some of our vets.
Smith can play third line but Greening, Neil and Condra are all forth line players.
Well the fact is any player with a one-way contract that is not waiver exempt is in the way of the young guys in Bingo, even if they aren't performing up to expectations.
I do not wish to make this a "Conacher vs the prospects" discussion because IMO its just not that at all. While Cory may not have produced at the level some might have expected, he still has produced more than Greening, Condra, Neil and Smith.
I echo your sentiments on how the young players have been handled, seeing Greening and Condra penciled in on lines one and two while Cory drops to line 4 makes little sense to me.
However my point was directed at single comment, "he had the proper opportunity" when in fact he did not.
IMO two games shows nothing, and the reasons offered up by MacLean vague and meaningless. After listening to the Murray interview from yesterday it is clear he believes Hoffman is an NHL player and that he wasn't given an appropriate opportunity. Obviously I agree.
History has shown that most young players need time, not measured in games but in seasons.
Safe to say Mike needs to "Hoff-man up" if he wants to stay with the big club. Am I right?
Sorry.
you mike hoff to show yourself the door after that one, man.
Paul Maclean was saying on the Team 1200 that they believe he's an NHLer and that they intend to give him a good look this time around. Also said they encouraged him to just play his game this time, they felt he played scared in last call up and that he needs to trust his instincts as he's an offensive player.
Completely. He played like a spastic 4th line speedster... when you watch him play in the AHL, he's wayyyy more cerebral.
Anyone know if he has to pass through waivers if lets say he is sent back in 3 games or so? I think he does not, as he already did that at the beginning of the year and he hasn't been with the club for 30 (?) days.
I think Garrioch said he has 7 games/21 days before he eligible to be claimed off waivers
Hoffman is just too good not to stick. Some high scoring AHL can't stick because they're too small or can't skate. Neither is the case for Hoffman. He'll make it
Now, someone needs to be traded so Da Costa can get back up here. He was terrific
Well, we don't know that's he's not big/durable enough to stick. He looked good in a very brief stint last year but hurt his shoulder almost immediately. I think that's the biggest question mark with him.