From the rule book:
When the net is accidentally displaced by an attacking player, and the defending side is in control of the puck and moving out of their zone, play shall be permitted to continue until such time as the nonoffending team loses control of the puck. The resulting face-off will take place at a face-off spot in the zone nearest the location where the play was stopped, unless it is in the non-offending team’s defending zone, and as such the ensuing face-off would be outside the blue line at one of the face-off spots in the neutral zone. It is possible for a goal to be scored at one end of the rink while the net at the other end has been dislodged, provided that the team being scored upon is the team responsible for dislodging the net at the other end of the rink
Look at that last screenshot posted. Click on it. There's white there with the puck on it's edge beyond the red line. That's a goal. But you'll keep denying it and honestly at this point, I don't really care to keep this circular circus show going. Enjoy the loss.No you can't because you can't see white from the top of the puck and the goal line. This isn't that hard buddy.
No, these are pretty objective calls to be made. If you can't see white between the puck and the goal line, no goal is to be called. And the high touch was a pretty easy call to make since he touched the puck above his shoulders. Calls get missed which happens but it doesn't change that the right calls weren't made.
LOL you're trolling at this point. Look at that last screenshot posted. Click on it. There's white there with the puck on it's edge beyond the red line. That's a goal. But you'll keep denying it and honestly at this point, I don't really care to keep this circular circus show going. Enjoy the loss.
Bruins just Vince McMahon walked through California.
Look at the picture and zoom in. Seems like a really strange thing for us to say that is not a goal. If that isn’t a goal, it’s literally by a damn hair and that is an issue.
Well sorrrry, but more often than not, how the refs handled that situation is how it normally shakes down. Good enough wording?
Hopefully he does. Chara is having more and more “senior moments”
Look at the picture and zoom in. Seems like a really strange thing for us to say that is not a goal. If that isn’t a goal, it’s literally by a damn hair and that is an issue.
Bruins didn't even deserve 1 point in that game. They were totally outclassed which makes the screw job even worse. I think the Bruins had like 7 shots the last 50 minutes.
They need to make the line so extremely clear that people can't even argue. It's not, and that's where the argument seems to be.
Bruins didn't even deserve 1 point in that game. They were totally outclassed which makes the screw job even worse. I think the Bruins had like 7 shots the last 50 minutes.
LOL you can clearly tell from that screenshot that it's a goal. Keep lying to yourself that it wasn't. It's all moot anyway; hockey justice was served.
He took control in the 3rd and and OT. Chara is what 43?
McAvoy is stronger than I thought.
They made 2 of those shots count though.....
Bruins just Vince McMahon walked through California.
Charlie McAvoy after the OT goal:The Bruins pulled the tights in a roll up victory. Full Heel move, tonight.
41. His regression is noticeable when you watch it night in and night out. Really slow out there now.
McAvoy had a slow come back from some of his injuries. Wasn’t playing that well for a little but recently and tonight he has been playing like the player all of us see as that future franchise Dman.