I still want to suggest squads of 11+7.
Thanks for the suggestion, but we'll stick with what we did last year.
I still want to suggest squads of 11+7.
Les Habs by fluke alone somehow got Ronaldo...
I actually got a sick idea which includes @Evilo's thoughts about keeping the draft to certain leagues....what if....we expand the draft to 20 participants or even up to 27 posters. We then split the posters via randomization or by freedom (choice) alone to three different conferences each with 9 posters in them (FYI: using 27 as the set bar). In each different conference will only allows picks to be made for certain European leagues. For example....
Conference/Division #1: Would only be able to pick players from France and Germany (with other random countries)
Conference/Division #2: Would only be able to pick players from England and Italy (with other random countries)
Conference/Division #3: Would only be able to pick players from Spain and Portugal (with other random countries)
It would be any single player that plays in one of those domestic leagues regardless of country. What I mean by this is that the teams in Division #3 wouldn't be allowed to pick Harry Kane because he would only be eligible to the teams in Division #2. I get that this would make it a tad too complicated, but wanted to know some thoughts on this idea?
Ehhhhhh, he already does? The "E" in my name stands for Edo as all the other letters stand for another poster(s). We are all one.An apology is in order!
"Sick" idea indeed. My advice would be not to partner with @Edo at all, but if you must you probably should give him access to your account.
Ehhhhhh, he already does? The "E" in my name stands for Edo as all the other letters stand for another poster. We are all one.
Foolishness? Does your depravity know no bounds? We've been correct majority of the time even against all the stain coloured glasses on this board.What a convenient excuse for all the foolishness you've posted on here
This is also my preference. The draft usually dies off toward the end with 22.I still want to suggest squads of 11+7.
There should be no limit on participants and I don't know why were just throwing last year's list in the mix. As we've seen in the past previous participation is not indicative of current participation. It will also be an eight hour time limit and there should be none of this " well I'm just gonna give him a little bit more time" nonsense. Finally all I'll say is it amazes me how all of you like to come back for more punishment year after year, but so be it.
Also I don't mind running the draft pick randomization, or the draft pick thread if needed. As long as people are willing to help me out a little.
This is also my preference. The draft usually dies off toward the end with 22.
We honestly should try to put people into groups based on time zone and Have that influence the draft positions accordingly. It's tough to keep alternating time zones between picks
I'm always one of the people that is most active; I generally am pretty happy with my late picks. Your plans are usually very impressive though, keep up the good work!You mean that's usually when you lot get most taken advantage of by those of us with a plan
I would:Maybe have a randomly generated first 2 or 4 rounds and then at a certain point we tweak the draft order to better lineup timezones as we get past the super elite players?
Yeah this time zone **** is stupid. The draft worked great last year.
Also fineThat's ridiculously unfair. Let's not add a bunch of gimmicks and keep things the way they were.