HF Wrestling Draft 2018 - Discussion Thread #2

[ColePens]

You get to decide who advances. You said you'd forfeit, you created the whole mess, you benefited from the extra votes, you changed yours to try balance it out only to back out on that too.

You can take the win or not, it's up to you. You sapped the fun out of it and ruined the genuine contest. If you want to win like that feel free.

The people spoke. They want a triple threat.

Oh.. and you do realize this is LITERALLY for nothing? If you want, I can meet someone at the local Chipotle and grab them a bowl to go. I'll pay for extra chicken, because protein gainz, BUT NO GUACAMOLE. I'M NOT PAYING FOR GUAC.

 

[Morozov]

The people spoke. They want a triple threat.

Oh.. and you do realize this is LITERALLY for nothing? If you want, I can meet someone at the local Chipotle and grab them a bowl to go. I'll pay for extra chicken, because protein gainz, BUT NO GUACAMOLE. I'M NOT PAYING FOR GUAC.

Like I said, if this crap gets treated as a draw I'll bow out. I'm not playing the vote begging popularity contest that you turned this into, it's not what the rest of us signed up for. So it's up to you, you can stick to your word and forfeit, or you can take the tainted win.

You're the one who went vote begging then came in here throwing the personal attacks. People aren't buying it CP. You're also the one who said he'd forfeit but then backtracked, apparently it means a whole lot to you lol.

So, choice is yours. Advance if you want to.

 

[ColePens]

Awwww schucks. Triple threat.

 

[JackSlater]

I'm voting for PeterSidorkiewicz in the finals regardless of who the opposition is as I like his card much more than the other two, but I do hope that there isn't a three card final. There needs to be a tie breaker of some kind given that it could happen again in the finals and that sending both teams sets up a negative incentive for future votes. Triple threat would be crap.

I will say, this situation did emerge last year and there was a triple threat in the second round. There should be some way to break ties though.

 

[Morozov]

Awwww schucks. Triple threat.

"all talk no walk"

 

[Morozov]

I'm voting for PeterSidorkiewicz in the finals regardless of who the opposition is as I like his card much more than the other two, but I do hope that there isn't a three card final. There needs to be a tie breaker of some kind given that it could happen again in the finals and that sending both teams sets up a negative incentive for future votes. Triple threat would be crap.

I'd rather PeterSidorkiewicz win than have some bastardized triple threat final.

 

[M.C.G. 31]

For the record regardless of who goes to the finals, triple threat or one on one, @PeterSidorkiewicz would get my vote anyways. War Games with an amazing main event.

 

[Morozov]

I had PeterSidorkiewicz card as my favourite from the beginning.

 

[ColePens]

"all talk no walk"

Triple threat

 

[Morozov]

Triple threat

Nope.

If we ever get a triple threat final it's going to be cool and happened legitimately not in a crap environment like this where it happened because of you vote begging.

 

[JackSlater]

Could decide it with all votes from previous rounds counted. That system wouldn't work in a first round match up though.

 

[Cor]

Let's cut a baby in half and hope one of them conceed defeat in order to save the baby

If one of them don't, then we have a triple threat final, and both @Morozov and @ColePens have half a baby

 

[Le Barron de HF]

Could decide it with all votes from previous rounds counted. That system wouldn't work in a first round match up though.

That's a good idea, for first round, we'll just rely on pure flipism

 

[Disclose]

revote without Pens board involved. its just logical.

 

[JackSlater]

It's been decided. Sometimes you have to put an old dog out of his misery.