spiderham616
Registered User
- Feb 5, 2019
- 69
- 16
+/-?Have you seen Riellys +/-?
Riellys -46 career
Lindholm is a +80
I mean we are comparing apples to oranges here. But I think you should see those stats before knocking on Lindholm. His +/- is bad.
You mean a statistic that has been proven irrelevant for over a decade.
Cool. Good for Lindholm, again forget the context of Rielly playing on a rebuilding train wreck for most of his career and Lindholm walking on to a contender that had a down year.
I've only made one point in each post and still it's ignored.
Lindholm is better than Rielly because you like him more, that's proof enough for me.