Well considering Montreal has never given anyone a contract longer than 6 years ever, the 7 years is a pretty big step.
No they offered Brière 7 years when he chose to go with Philly.
Doughty, Karlsson and Pietrangelo weren't jerked around with bridge deals. Also, they were signed under the last CBA.
Offering 7M for 7 years is a lowball offer considering the bridge deal. I can't imagine PK accepting. I wouldn't if I were him.
EDIT: The fact is that PK was lowballed and forced into a crappy bridge deal with the promise that he had to show more and he'd get his due. When you do that, you lose any and all hope of good faith from the other party and the next deal you are forced to pay top dollars with no discount at all. Unless Subban is a much much better man than me.
Your best player should be the highest paid player and PK isn't our best player.
Your best player should be the highest paid player and PK isn't our best player.
Your best player should be the highest paid player and PK isn't our best player.
Not only wrong but that was completely void of any thought whatsoever.
Yeah, I'd say Subban is our best player.
I'd say Price is but since his contract was signed when cap was lower then he will have a lower yearly salary than a top player signing today. The price of contracts change as the cap changes. one reason why if you believe a player will be solid for ten years you try to sign him long term to get the savings as the cap increases. For upcoming RFA and UFA on the Habs team PK is the best and he has a Norris and Olympic under his belt so I would say he is worth 7.5-8 and would be great to get him signed for 8 years 60 Million.Yeah, I'd say Subban is our best player.
Price has been our best player by far this year. Last year was Subban. The year before, no one was any good.
Yeah, this. I don't see any point in offering 7 instead of 8. If you can go 8, and you're going that long, you go 8.Why not 8 years bergevin?