Mete has 'excellent' skating.
And that's it.
And now, what I'm doing here is not bashing him, I'm just using the right words.
Is he an 'excellent' dman ?
Nope.
#1-2 and some #3 are excellent, or have multiple excellent qualities.
He's mostly our #3 right now, behind Weber and Petry, but it doesn't mean he's a #3 factually. (Petry is our #2 but is more of a #3 in reality)
It mostly mean our defense is pretty bad.
Can he become a 'real' #3 someday ?
Perhaps. Still only what, 20yo ?
But, damn, saying he's 'excellent', come on, Weber is excellent, Petry is on some nights, otherwise, we don't have any dmen who fits that criteria...