Ezpz
No mad pls
- Apr 16, 2013
- 14,963
- 11,188
I've changed my stance on this trade.
He obviously wants to sign him. He wouldn't make the deal if he didn't.
But I don't trust him.
Same as Chiarot, no more, no less.I don't know about term. But I'm expecting the AAV to be around the $4M mark.
Same as Chiarot, no more, no less.
Forget Hoffman in montreal with the bullshit that happenedideally you'd want something like,
xxxx Weber
Chia Petry
Edmundson Romanov
Kulak Juulsen
that way Romanov could hopefully focus on his offensive game more. If Edmundson needs a game off move Romanov over and put Juulsen in. The problem is you don't know where his game is at since he's only played 1 game. But you don't want to lose him for nothing.
Instead of spending gobs of money on Hall, I wonder what they could get for a Danault/Domi, Mete, say a 2nd round pick or more trade in term of a top LD PP QB. Since they badly need a PP QB or this team won't do shit imo. Then sign a UFA like Dadonov or Hoffman.
Does Romanov play on the right? I know he shoots left, so I just assumed he mainly played on that side too.ideally you'd want something like,
xxxx Weber
Chia Petry
Edmundson Romanov
Kulak Juulsen
that way Romanov could hopefully focus on his offensive game more. If Edmundson needs a game off move Romanov over and put Juulsen in. The problem is you don't know where his game is at since he's only played 1 game. But you don't want to lose him for nothing.
Instead of spending gobs of money on Hall, I wonder what they could get for a Danault/Domi, Mete, say a 2nd round pick or more trade in term of a top LD PP QB. Since they badly need a PP QB or this team won't do shit imo. Then sign a UFA like Dadonov or Hoffman.
Does Romanov play on the right? I know he shoots left, so I just assumed he mainly played on that side too.
Everyone is forgettinga about Fleury. Am I the only one who thinks he got shafted in the numbers game? I really liked him.
In the past as with Gainey acquiring Hossa’s rights from Wings it was conditional son the player signing- the fact the pick us no longer conditional leads me to believe there a level of confidence that he’ll re-up
La combativité de Marc Bergevin annonce un automne intéressant
Martic Leclerc writes about the Edmundson acquisition and of his belief that this off-season will be a very interesting one for Bergevin.
View attachment 367336
In this part, he says that among 45 defensenen who played an average of 2:20 or more on the PK, Edmundson was 6th in least goals against (55). He mentioned other D who also played 2:20 or more on the PK like Giordano, Provorov, and Josi, who had more goals against.
He then mentions that out of the 121 defensemen that have played at least 180 games over the last 3 seasons, Edmundson is 33rd in turnovers/60 mins. He is 24th in blocked shots (5.3/60 mins). And he's 20th in hits (5.53/60 mins).
He also says in the article that Edmundson's agent also represents Chiarot, Brook, Juulsen, and Fleury. So he is an agent that has a familiarity with him.
Does Romanov play on the right? I know he shoots left, so I just assumed he mainly played on that side too.
He played often on the right side like most lhd shooter do in Russia.
It's the first sentence that gives me fright... Bergevin already had some interesting summers... aka Karl Alzner summer... i would rather he didn't again.
That same summer where Radulov and Markov left. Easily his worst off-season.
For sure. That might be the worst offseason of all time in habs history, actually.
Not only for what you listed, but it also included Alzner as the marquee signing.
Then you include the streit, and Hemsky signings into the equation, neither of whom made it through October if I remember correctly.
What a disaster.
Was that the year that people kept saying “no way we take this cap space into the season/new year/playoffs lol”
Pretty condescending aren’t you? For the record, I understand what you’re trying to say, but I also wonder just how you think the Habs aquire this number one, smooth skating top defenceman? You’re real smart, so please call Bergy and let him know. It’s not everyday a guy like Hedman, Makar, Hughes comes around. So what do you suggest?I didn’t say all defensemen should be offensively productive, so I’ll skip countering this weak strawman argument.
if you can’t see a difference between Weber, chiarot and the D I mentioned, then there’s no point in discussing. Not going to waste my time explaining things to you.
He showed me alot in 41 games last season. He will make his place.Everyone is forgettinga about Fleury. Am I the only one who thinks he got shafted in the numbers game? I really liked him.
Everyone is forgettinga about Fleury. Am I the only one who thinks he got shafted in the numbers game? I really liked him.
Pretty condescending aren’t you? For the record, I understand what you’re trying to say, but I also wonder just how you think the Habs aquire this number one, smooth skating top defenceman? You’re real smart, so please call Bergy and let him know. It’s not everyday a guy like Hedman, Makar, Hughes comes around. So what do you suggest?
If one of us had warned him about Sergachev would he have listened?
It is a fair point but tbh really don't think players look at it that way (if anything be mad at your agent, he's the one that's supposed to know players "value"), the cap moves, rosters change consistently, there's a lot of teams with lesser players making much more money than better players, in the end I'm pretty sure they're happy when they put their signature on a contract and not worrying about other players/teammates situation... I might be wrong and your point is valid, it's just the way i see itI really don’t like the message it would send to Chiarot. Edmundston is not better than you, the fact is that you will play more minutes, but let’s give him 1M$ more per and 3 more years.
I also have a hard time seeing Edmundston sign for 3.5M$ per but I don’t see how we can offer more.