Value of: Grubauer to Buffalo/NYI

Riseonfire

Josh Bailey! GAME ONE, TO THE ISLAND!!!
Nov 8, 2009
11,363
5,377
Cory has a no trade clause on one of the up and coming teams in the Metro that plays the way the game needs to be played to win right now (fast all day long). Why would he wave to go to a team that may or may not be as good as the Devils next year?

Cause he might not want to ride the pine behind Keith.
 

Rasmus CacOlainen

The end of the Tank
Sep 24, 2015
7,227
1,142
Europe
I'd say take out the Florida 2nd and the Caps probably trade Grubauer to Buffalo. Two 2nd rounders would be good value if a team isn't willing to dish out a 1st. I still think someone is willing to part with a later 1st rounder for him though. His numbers have been great
Our 2018 2nd is 32 OA. 0 chance we give that up and another 2nd just for Grubauer. Its fair value with FLA's 2nd coming our way.
 

saintunspecified

Registered User
Nov 30, 2017
6,109
4,386
The problem with Grubauer is the Caps aren’t going to be looking to do the islanders any favores so his price to a division rival will be significantly higher imo and hes has great numbers and he’s ready to try and prove he’s a starter.

Grubauer is virtually in the same spot as Schneider was when Lou acquired him from VAN for the 9th overall pick. So it will be interesting.

I'm not sure how much this matters as much at the draft as it does during the season. But if NYI makes an offer that is significantly better than others, I think they should be able to land him. It's just a question of how much NYI has to offer.

The thing that always bothers me about these scenarios is that everyone assumes that nobody will hand Grubauer an offer sheet between 7/1 and 7/5. That assumption is probably accurate, and it's a scandal. The way the system is negotiated, the player has some leverage about where they will play. But everyone assumes, and especially Caps fans in this thread, that this isn't the case. They're probably right, but only because collusion is rampant in the NHL.

If it weren't, a 3 year/4M AAV contract offer wouldn't be a bad bet on Grubauer. Then the Caps would have to decide whether to match, and keep him at that salary for at least 1 year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SI90

DRW204

Registered User
Dec 26, 2010
22,409
27,340
was curious about some of the numbers/contract status and returns of some of the traded goalies mentioned in this thread...just used hockeyref and cap friendly to summarize their stats and contract status from career to trade

PlayerAgeGPGSWLT/OGASASVSV%GAASOMINQSQS%RBSContract Status @ time of tradeTraded for
Grubauer21 - 2610179433111201261424130.9232.2965273490.628?/RFA?
Schneider22 - 26988655268197271525180.9272.295372580.674102 x 4M 9th OA in 2013
Andersen24 - 26125114772612271330530340.9182.3366973680.59614RFA30th OA in 2016 and 2017 2nd
Lehner19 - 238676303613230267624460.9142.8824788450.59292 x 2.225M21st OA in 2015 and D. Legwand
Talbot26 - 27575333155110159814880.931283306330.6232UFA2nd in 2015, 3rd in 2016 and 7th in 2015
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
 

hb12xchamps

Registered User
Dec 23, 2011
8,891
5,599
Pennsylvania
Our 2018 2nd is 32 OA. 0 chance we give that up and another 2nd just for Grubauer. Its fair value with FLA's 2nd coming our way.
Then there's no deal? Grubauer's stats project him as a starter for someone. People have paid a lot more than two 2nds for a starting goaltender and I'm sure there will be more than one team calling the Caps about Grubauer
 

Rasmus CacOlainen

The end of the Tank
Sep 24, 2015
7,227
1,142
Europe
Then there's no deal? Grubauer's stats project him as a starter for someone. People have paid a lot more than two 2nds for a starting goaltender and I'm sure there will be more than one team calling the Caps about Grubauer
I find it hard anyone would beat that offer for Grubauer.
 

Jame

Registered User
Sep 4, 2002
52,673
9,037
Florida
Buffalo should have zero interest in trading for a goalie...

Pay the cost in cap/salary for Bernier, while developing Ullmark and others behind him.
 

StephenPeat

Registered User
Jul 19, 2015
4,651
1,616
There are plenty of teams in Europe that would pay him several million to be their goalie. He won't sign with the Caps again to be a backup for low money. A trade this offseason WILL happen.
I’m leaning this way too but if he wants to play in the NHL he’s not absolutely in the clear to choose his destiny ala Darling, Talbot, etc. He’s technically still under team control this offseason and that’s important to his value. I highly doubt Grubauer himself or the Capitals will try to stick it to each other. I expect the situation to be resolved amicably, most likely via trade that is commensurate in value to what other goalies in similar situations have returned. (Mid- to Late-1st ballpark e.g. Jones/Lehner/Andersen). I’d imagine the Buf 2nd might be close if they want Grubauer, for instance.
 

THE Green Man

Registered User
Dec 27, 2013
2,965
721
Narnia
I'm surprised that the Islanders trade talk is all only focused on 12OV. They have 2 2nd rounders both relatively high. IMO their 1sts are a little too valuable to move for Grubauer. But both 2nds could be a decent base. This would give the Caps 4 picks in the top 46- one of which would probably be used as currency to move Orpik's contract.

The Islanders are able to add a goalie at a decent price to show JT they are looking to win now, as well as keep their 2 1sts. One could then be moved for a top 4 defenceman like it's been addressed in this thread, or just stockpile the cupboard with 2 decent prospects.

Technically Grubauer doesn't have to be moved, but with all the older UFA goalies on the market this year, who could easily take a 1 year deal to go to the team in the SCF, it would be smart for the Caps to do so. If they don't it probably means they are letting Carlson walk. That is poor asset management when you have Holtby already and eventually Samsonov. Additionally, with how well Kempny has played beside Carlson it would be smart to open up cap space by moving Grubauer and Orpik to be able to lock in Wilson, Carlson and Kempny.

Vancouver could be of help too in a 3 way scenario:

Washington in: Calgary and Islanders 2nd
Washington out: Grubauer, Orpik, Florida 2nd

Islanders in: Grubauer, Tanev + ____ from Vancouver
Islanders out: 12OV, Calgary and Islanders 2nds

Canucks in: 12OV, Florida 2nd, Orpik (pure cap dump unless NYI want him at 50% retention)
Canucks out: Tanev + ____?
 
  • Like
Reactions: IODCPiper

hb12xchamps

Registered User
Dec 23, 2011
8,891
5,599
Pennsylvania
I find it hard anyone would beat that offer for Grubauer.
Clearly there will be interest or there wouldn't be a trade thread talking about Washington's goalies every week on the main boards. If fans are interested and can see the value, I'm sure NHL GMs do. If multiple teams are interested there will be a mini bidding war. It wouldn't be off value for a team to part with a first round draft choice based on Grubauer's numbers in comparison to other goaltenders that have been moved for similar values.

Your original value is not that far off but I just don't see Washington giving up another 2nd rounder unless it's on draft day and there's another player available that they just can't live without.
 

Rasmus CacOlainen

The end of the Tank
Sep 24, 2015
7,227
1,142
Europe
Clearly there will be interest or there wouldn't be a trade thread talking about Washington's goalies every week on the main boards. If fans are interested and can see the value, I'm sure NHL GMs do. If multiple teams are interested there will be a mini bidding war. It wouldn't be off value for a team to part with a first round draft choice based on Grubauer's numbers in comparison to other goaltenders that have been moved for similar values.

Your original value is not that far off but I just don't see Washington giving up another 2nd rounder unless it's on draft day and there's another player available that they just can't live without.
Other teams showing interest and beating this offer are two completely separate things.
 

Dr Quincy

Registered User
Jun 19, 2005
28,745
10,637
was curious about some of the numbers/contract status and returns of some of the traded goalies mentioned in this thread...just used hockeyref and cap friendly to summarize their stats and contract status from career to trade

PlayerAgeGPGSWLT/OGASASVSV%GAASOMINQSQS%RBSContract Status @ time of tradeTraded for
Grubauer21 - 2610179433111201261424130.9232.2965273490.628?/RFA?
Schneider22 - 26988655268197271525180.9272.295372580.674102 x 4M 9th OA in 2013
Andersen24 - 26125114772612271330530340.9182.3366973680.59614RFA30th OA in 2016 and 2017 2nd
Lehner19 - 238676303613230267624460.9142.8824788450.59292 x 2.225M21st OA in 2015 and D. Legwand
Talbot26 - 27575333155110159814880.931283306330.6232UFA2nd in 2015, 3rd in 2016 and 7th in 2015
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
I appreciate the work, and I'm not saying it's irrelevant, but....

It's kinda like looking at other houses on your street and seeing what a similar one sold for in 2013, another one in 2015 and a 3rd in 2017. Different markets, different buyers.

You can say "Well, this shows that Grubauer is worth the 9th overall pick, because he is close to what Schneider was when he was dealt."

But the "value" or "worth" of an asset isn't exactly the same as what a similar asset was sold for. The value or worth is: What is someone willing to pay today. Maybe you find a buyer willing to give you 2 firsts. Maybe the highest offer you get is a 3rd. Maybe there's a bidding war. Maybe nobody makes an offer.

Comps are nice, but in the end it comes down to the actual specifics of finding an actual buyer, not just looking at a blue book value and saying "this is worth x because this guide says so".(mixing metaphors I know)
 

DRW204

Registered User
Dec 26, 2010
22,409
27,340
I appreciate the work, and I'm not saying it's irrelevant, but....

It's kinda like looking at other houses on your street and seeing what a similar one sold for in 2013, another one in 2015 and a 3rd in 2017. Different markets, different buyers.

You can say "Well, this shows that Grubauer is worth the 9th overall pick, because he is close to what Schneider was when he was dealt."

But the "value" or "worth" of an asset isn't exactly the same as what a similar asset was sold for. The value or worth is: What is someone willing to pay today. Maybe you find a buyer willing to give you 2 firsts. Maybe the highest offer you get is a 3rd. Maybe there's a bidding war. Maybe nobody makes an offer.

Comps are nice, but in the end it comes down to the actual specifics of finding an actual buyer, not just looking at a blue book value and saying "this is worth x because this guide says so".(mixing metaphors I know)
Obviously man... They're just comparables nothing set in stone. There are a few teams that could use a good goalie no different as it was in 2013/15/16.
 

hb12xchamps

Registered User
Dec 23, 2011
8,891
5,599
Pennsylvania
Other teams showing interest and beating this offer are two completely separate things.
Not necessarily. Other teams showing interest means that other teams are going to present offers of their own. Like I said, I think the Caps can get a better offer than that without having to give up a 2nd rounder in the process
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad