I Hate Blake Coleman
Bandwagon Burner
No one's calling Mike Gartner the best goal scorer.So you guys also believe that Mike Gartner was a better goal scorer than the likes of Mario,Yzerman,Sakic and Bobby Hull?
No one's calling Mike Gartner the best goal scorer.So you guys also believe that Mike Gartner was a better goal scorer than the likes of Mario,Yzerman,Sakic and Bobby Hull?
so if Ovie gets to 893 youd still think Gretzky is a better goalscorer?Gretzky was better than everyone else even if he was a playmaker. If Ovechkin gets to 895, I'll reconsider my position.
Howe: 5*1st, 12*top3, 14*top5, 19*top10 |
Hull: 7*1st, 10*top3, 12*top5, 13*top10 |
Richard: 5*1st, 9*top3, 13*top5, 14*top10 |
Ovechkin: 9*1st, 11*top3, 13*top5, 13*top10 |
Gretzky: 5*1st, 5*top3, 8*top5, 9*top10 |
Bossy: 2*1st, 7*top3, 8*top5, 9*top10 |
Lemieux: 3*1st, 6*top3, 6*top5, 9*top10 |
Esposito: 6*1st, 7*top3, 8*top5, 9*top10 |
Brett Hull: 3*1st, 4*top3, 4*top5, 8*top10 |
Pavel Bure: 3*1st, 4*top3, 5*top5, 5*top10 |
Depends how much emphasis you put on peak goal scoring, in tandem with career consistency/sustained success/longevity. For instance, Gretzky may not have as many top finishes as Hull but he has three seasons (83-84, 81-82 and 84-85) that are arguably better than Hull's best and those two best seasons are quite a bit ahead. Lemieux's peak dominance is also clearly ahead of Hull but he doesn't have anywhere near the longevity and consistency, true. On the other hand, Howe does have the one season (52-53) that is comparable to Gretzky/Lemieux's peak but I also feel Wayne/Mario have a few more higher-end seasons ahead of Howe.... and the true competition Ovechkin has for #1 goal-scorer all-time - Gordie Howe and Bobby Hull - get zero votes combined
Here are the counts of top1, top3, top5, top10 finishes for most folks mentioned in the OP
How in the world can someone who has as many top10 finishes as Hull/Howe have top3 finishes be ranked above them?[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Howe: 5*1st, 12*top3, 14*top5, 19*top10 Hull: 7*1st, 10*top3, 12*top5, 13*top10 Richard: 5*1st, 9*top3, 13*top5, 14*top10 Ovechkin: 9*1st, 11*top3, 13*top5, 13*top10 Gretzky: 5*1st, 5*top3, 8*top5, 9*top10 Bossy: 2*1st, 7*top3, 8*top5, 9*top10 Lemieux: 3*1st, 6*top3, 6*top5, 9*top10 Esposito: 6*1st, 7*top3, 8*top5, 9*top10 Brett Hull: 3*1st, 4*top3, 4*top5, 8*top10 Pavel Bure: 3*1st, 4*top3, 5*top5, 5*top10
That isn't the point. He has more goals than the players listed. do you believe he is a better goal scorer than them?No one's calling Mike Gartner the best goal scorer.
For instance, Gretzky may not have as many top finishes as Hull but he has three seasons (83-84, 81-82 and 84-85) that are arguably better than Hull's best and those two best seasons are quite a bit ahead. Lemieux's peak dominance is also clearly ahead of Hull but he doesn't have anywhere near the longevity and consistency, true.
Hull Sr 86-80-56-54-44-32-30-26-10-9-0 |
Richard 79-62-61-59-42-31-31-6-4-0-0 |
Howe 81-74-65-42-31-30-27-15-11-10-7-3-0-0 |
Gretzky 70-67-33-27-19-6-0-0 |
Ovechkin 51-43-40-39-38-32-19-17-17-16-7-4-0 |
Lemieux 67-37-35-4-4 |
Depends how much emphasis you put on peak goal scoring, in tandem with career consistency/sustained success/longevity. For instance, Gretzky may not have as many top finishes as Hull but he has three seasons (83-84, 81-82 and 84-85) that are arguably better than Hull's best and those two best seasons are quite a bit ahead. Lemieux's peak dominance is also clearly ahead of Hull but he doesn't have anywhere near the longevity and consistency, true. On the other hand, Howe does have the one season (52-53) that is comparable to Gretzky/Lemieux's peak but I also feel Wayne/Mario have a few more higher-end seasons ahead of Howe.
I think Gretzky and Lemieux were better goalscorers at their best but you're right that they have less top finishes. If you value peak highly, it's not a stretch to rank Howe or Hull behind Lemieux and Gretzky. They're all pretty close and it can come down to how much emphasis you want to place on the difference between "best" and "greatest".
% over 5th only tells you so much. I'd say that Gretzky's 83-84 season and Mario's 88-89 season are clearly ahead of any of Hull's mid-60s seasons, based on sheer numbers alone. Actually, I'd go so far as to say that Bobby isn't even the Hull who peaked highest in the goalscoring department and that Brett's best seasons are better. Howe's 52-53 season is pretty much up there with any of Wayne or Mario's best years but the latter two have a few more in and around this level.OK, let's look at % leads over #5 in goals:
The numbers do not bear out the assertion that Gretzky's peak as a goal-scorer was higher than Bobby Hull's or Howe's.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Hull Sr 86-80-56-54-44-32-30-26-10-9-0 Richard 79-62-61-59-42-31-31-6-4-0-0 Howe 81-74-65-42-31-30-27-15-11-10-7-3-0-0 Gretzky 70-67-33-27-19-6-0-0 Ovechkin 51-43-40-39-38-32-19-17-17-16-7-4-0 Lemieux 67-37-35-4-4
Lemieux' resume outside of 1988/89 is rather sad for this company.
Beyond historical context, you could also look at adjusted numbers. It's obviously not a perfect formula but comparing eras is hard enough as it is already.Hulls 65/66 beats any Gretzky season but I guess it's arguable. Not sure what metric you're looking at to conclude Lemieux is "clearly ahead" of Hull for peak goal scoring. Hull won the Rocket by 22 goals in a 70 game season, even though he only played 65 games. He scored 54 goals while no one else scored 33. Only 5 other 30 goal scorers who played 70, 70, 70, 68 and 68 games to his 65. Zuluss posted the % lead over 5th and I'm pretty sure Hull would win for % over 2nd and 10th as well. Curious why/how you say Lemieux is clearly ahead.
I'd say that Gretzky's 83-84 season and Mario's 88-89 season are clearly ahead of any of Hull's mid-60s seasons, based on sheer numbers alone.
I'm not going to argue a point that doesn't matter and a point I wasn't making in the first place. Your anti-argument doesn't work if I don't bother. You can f***ing argue with someone else about Gartner's ranking.That isn't the point. He has more goals than the players listed. do you believe he is a better goal scorer than them?
Gretzky has the most goals on a single season. He has the league overall record for goals. He scored 50 or more eight consecutive seasons and 50 nine times overall.
There's no rage, this is just how I talk. That's a point that's irrelevant. Gretzky has the accomplishments and that's why he's in the argument in the first place.Lol why the rage? Just making the point either goal totals with no context are all that matter or they aren't.
By those same metrics (mostly looking at raw numbers) would you say that Bossy and Dionne are better than Crosby and McDavid?I'm not going to argue a point that doesn't matter and a point I wasn't making in the first place. Your anti-argument doesn't work if I don't bother. You can f***ing argue with someone else about Gartner's ranking.
Gretzky has the most goals on a single season. He has the league overall record for goals. He scored 50 or more eight consecutive seasons and 50 nine times overall. Gretzky compensates for a lack of goal scoring longevity by his dominance. He lead the NHL in goals five times and his competition was pretty good.
I didn't even mention 50 in 39 until now. He scored 92.
All I said my original post can be boiled down to "wait and see."
Obviously I'm speaking relative to era. It's why I think OV's current career goal numbers, albeit less than Gretzky's, are already more impressive (and OV still has more runway to add to that). Thus, I think 87 and 92 goal seasons in the early 80s are better than 54 and 58 goals (from Hull) in the mid-60s.Based on sheer numbers, Steve Shutt probably peaked higher than Howe as a goal-scorer - Shutt did score 60 goals, and Howe never scored 50.
Any measure that measures dominance over peers, be it VsX or % lead over #5, will call into doubt the idea that Gretzky and especially Lemieux peaked higher as goal-scorers than Bobby Hull and Gordie Howe.
By those same metrics (mostly looking at raw numbers) would you say that Bossy and Dionne are better than Crosby and McDavid?
They have more points overall, higher single season highs in points, more 100 point seasons.
At the end of the day, you have to realize that the era that guys played in DOES matter. Gretzky may have peaked very high as a goalscorer, but acting like Ovechkin *needs* to pass Gretzky in a raw perspective is just completely ignorant.
Obviously I'm speaking relative to era. It's why I think OV's current career goal numbers, albeit less than Gretzky's, are already more impressive (and OV still has more runway to add to that). Thus, I think 87 and 92 goal seasons in the early 80s are better than 54 and 58 goals (from Hull) in the mid-60s.
1st | 2nd | 5th | 10th | lead vs #2 | lead vs #5 | lead vs #10 | |
1965-66 | 54 | 32 | 30 | 28 | 69% | 93% | 80% |
1981-82 | 92 | 64 | 54 | 50 | 44% | 84% | 70% |
1983-84 | 87 | 56 | 52 | 47 | 55% | 85% | 67% |
1988-89 | 85 | 70 | 51 | 46 | 21% | 85% | 67% |
What would be the metric under which Hull's 1965/66 is worse than Gretzky's 1981/82 or 1983/84?[TBODY] [/TBODY]
1st 2nd 5th 10th lead vs #2 lead vs #5 lead vs #10 1965-66 54 32 30 28 69% 93% 80% 1981-82 92 64 54 50 44% 84% 70% 1983-84 87 56 52 47 55% 85% 67% 1988-89 85 70 51 46 21% 85% 67%
The table above does not show any.
This is the correct answer. Lemieux is the best goal scorer. Ovie is the greatest goal scorer. Lemieux’s goals per game trumps ovie quit comfortably.Ovechkin deserves the title of greatest at this point. I think Lemieux was the best though.
Esposito?
No, but he should probably be in this poll as well.
I think the answer is so obvious that you guys just expected him to be in the poll
Ahh...yeah. The Rocket