KrejciMVP
Registered User
So hockey only has drama if there is fighting?
Seems like you might want to watch a combat sport then.
maybe but whatever version of hockey you're pushing is an automatic change of the channel.
So hockey only has drama if there is fighting?
Seems like you might want to watch a combat sport then.
Yeah I remember watching the Miracle on Ice game and switching to The Bionic Woman because there just weren't any fights in it.maybe but whatever version of hockey you're pushing is an automatic change of the channel.
It is different for sure and I miss all the rough stuff. It's way faster and more skilled today tho so I like that about it. If I could change the game back to how it was I probably would but that's not gonna happen so I enjoy it for what it is.
I get my violence fix thru Boxing, MMA and Muay Thai Kickboxing anyhow.
Never said that.We need a player like Lucic so our stars don't get hit!!!!
Oh, wait...
You are consistent if nothing elseSo hockey only has drama if there is fighting?
Seems like you might want to watch a combat sport then.
Weak, so, so weak. Not even worth a strawman argument response. How did you survive watching Cherry's lunch pail ac, through clenched fingers and gnashing of teeth over the brutality of the Bruins?Yeah I remember watching the Miracle on Ice game and switching to The Bionic Woman because there just weren't any fights in it.
You are consistent if nothing else
If you're talking the forwards only, I dont disagree that we're a bit on the soft side. I'm more concerned with adding scoring depth but some toughness up front would be nice. Ideally, they'll add someone who brings both without overpaying.Never said that.
1. The only things I have said in this thread is the fact that I believe the Bruins are small, and too soft up front for the post season. I don't think the Danton Heinen's, Anders Bjorks, Ryan Donato (though, he's playing well) and JFK are answers when the post season physically ramps up.
2. They lack a guy in the top 9 that is physical and isn't lost with the gloves off (basically to take pressure off Marchand and company) - I have no problem with the defense.
I'm kind of at the point where I'm done arguing about the effect of fighting when it comes to momentum, whether that exists or doesn't. I'm likely not changing anyone's opinion on it, and people are not likely to change mine.
MaybeAs opposed to your ever shifting view on the subject?
I mean, come on, you have to admit that you are steadfast in your belief as well.
So, McQuaid hit Pac, even though he totally knew that Reaves was on Vegas and was one of the few guys who could beat Adam in a fight.
Yet, despite knowing this, Adam still decided to hit Max anyway and face the fight......
I'm sorry, what exactly was your point? Reaves deterred absolutely nothing?
8-10? What's your list?IMO, McQuaid isn’t going to be deterred by anyone. He’s one of the 8-10 best fighters in the league.
Yeah, no slug like Pat Quinn ever touched or with a cheap shot back in the pre-instigator rule days when Boston was the Big Bad Bruins...
8-10? What's your list?
Great fight the other night! Is McQuaid vs Reaves the end? The last great fight? Man I hope not
I forgot about Johnston and Haley. Both definitely top 10. I thought of Engellend when was I typing but forgot to add him. He's getting old but still top 10 if he wants. Foligno and Deslauriers are good ads too. Both would beat Nurse most likely.1. Reaves
2. Lucic
3. Johnston
4. McQuaid
5. Engelland
6. Haley
7. Chara
8. Wilson
9. Simmonds
10. McLeod
HM: Kassian, N.Foligno, Deslauriers, Miller
Engelland isn't really active, though.
Crazy to think even less than 10 years ago we had..
McGrattan
Orr
Parros
Westgarth
Gazdic
Boogaard
Scott
Peluso
Reaves
McLaren
Thornton
etc
Those guys all had skill to go with their toughness tho. Jay Miller and Lyndon Byers wouldn't make an NHL team today. I don't think anyone in here has said there's no place for tough players in today's NHL. They just have to be able to play the game a bit too.Today's NHL would have no place for Terry O'Reilly,Wendel Clark,Tiger Williams,Rick Tocchet,and many more. Plenty of room for Ulf Nilsson and Anders Hedberg.
They were also players that crossed the line and whose effectiveness was linked to their nastiness,they'd be penalized into oblivion. Can you imagine a Terry O'Reilly that fought twice a year? LB was drafted as a junior Neely,but got suckered into the tough guy role.Those guys all had skill to go with their toughness tho. Jay Miller and Lyndon Byers wouldn't make an NHL team today. I don't think anyone in here has said there's no place for tough players in today's NHL. They just have to be able to play the game a bit too.
Your logical fallacy is appeal to authorityYeah, well no one has ever claimed it stopped everything, and as far as I know, that isn't the argument being made here. The players say things were different back then. Who am I to disagree? But whatever the reality of fighting in the NHL is, there isn't even an opportunity to see if players policing the game as was done in the past might at least reduce some of the cheap shots. It really doesn't matter too much what the reality of it is at this point. This thread is going around in endless circles because whatever side you take on the debate the NHL is a different league now.