And reckoning if you think charlie huddy was a good defenseman you got issues. And steve smith has been a pilon his whole career not just because of the goal that cost the series with the oilers. Those guys were so immobile and slow for that era they would constantly get beat on odd man rushes. And anyone who thinks Paul coffey was a good defensive defenseman has the same issues as reckoning has.
You do realize that 4 of the 7 defensemen on Canada's '84 Canada Cup team were Oilers right? -- as well as Steve Smith being a part of the '91 team?
Unless Team Canada had a penchant for stocking it's D-line with slow and immoble defensemen, your argument holds no water. This is especially true considering the Soviets had a habit of embarrassing
slow and immoble defensmen back then.....which they didn't do to Canada in 1984 (or '91 for that matter).
We all agree that those Oilers squads weren't outstanding defensively; however, to state that Kevin Lowe was the only D-man who wasn't a pylon is outright nonsense.
Huddy, Lowe, Gregg, Coffey, Fogolin, Beukeboom, McSorely, Muni, etc. made for a pretty solid d-core those years. In addition, they had some very good 2-way forwards who played both ends of the ice (Kurri, Messier, MacTavish, Krushelnyski, Hunter to name a few).
Fuhr was what he was; one of the better goalies during a terrible decade for his position. However, when compared to other
top netminders, he's a sub-par goalie who had the luxury of playing on a sick team. He's certainly nothing compared to Tretiak who always battled toe-to-toe with some of the best NHL goalies of all time during the stacked 1970's.