pacde said:Only valid arguement I heard bob make was about the revenue shareing. This league needs revenue sharing - I do think this is a major part of the NFL success. You can flush the rest of what he said.
pacde said:Only valid arguement I heard bob make was about the revenue shareing. This league needs revenue sharing - I do think this is a major part of the NFL success. You can flush the rest of what he said.
Balej20 said:Mike and the mad dog is a well respected, top notch sports talk show. so im not sure why you are taking shots at the shows creditability.
Eh. For every person that likes Mike and the Mad Dog, there is a person that can't stand them.Balej20 said:Mike and the mad dog is a well respected, top notch sports talk show. so im not sure why you are taking shots at the shows creditability.
DownFromNJ said:Haha! Whatever happened to that guy?
clefty said:That was a pretty unprofessional interview, IMO. In fact, I'm reluctant to even call it an interview. Goodenow was ambushed, plain and simple. Now, whose side I'm on is irrelevant, but the man gave his time to be interviewed, not attacked and screamed at by some obnoxious New Yorker. I don't care what kind of reputation the show has or how well it is respected, it was pretty classless.
I mean, what good does this do?
handtrick said:Just think how humiliating that interview had to be for any player that has listened to it......would kinda be like seeing your Dad get his ass kicked when you were a kid......
That's probably true. When you're defending a ridiculous position, you can't really help looking ridiculous.tom_servo said:I think it made for good listening. The interviewer did a fine job venting for the fans, but I don't think Goodenow handled himself poorly.