Thank you Wings fans for the praise. I really like this signing by Nill. Sounds like a great bottom 6 guy compared to some others we’ve had recently.
He's a good soldier if ever there was one. You'll love him in your bottom six.
Thank you Wings fans for the praise. I really like this signing by Nill. Sounds like a great bottom 6 guy compared to some others we’ve had recently.
sorry. that's what I meant. That it sounds like Dallas offered less money but more term. Whereas it sounds like the Wings may have offered a 1 year deal.More money but less term?
Saw 1.8M salary mentioned.
More money but less term?
Saw 1.8M salary mentioned.
We are talking about two players whose combined worth is less than $4 million. No need to be so hyperbolic.So, Detroit offered more money to Marc f***ing Staal than Luke f***ing Glendening.
That's f***ing insane.
We are talking about two players whose combined worth is less than $4 million. No need to be so hyperbolic.
We are talking about two players whose combined worth is less than $4 million. No need to be so hyperbolic.
Says more about the team than Glendening, honestly.Nothing hyperbolic about it.
Luke Glendening was major part of this team.
I guess you must not have been listening in on the private conversation where Steve said "we love you Luke, name your price," and Luke responded "at this point in my life it's not about the money, I just want the opportunity to contribute in the playoffs before my play drops off."So, Detroit offered more money to Marc f***ing Staal than Luke f***ing Glendening.
That's f***ing insane.
Alternate captain.
Top PK forward.
Most faceoffs taken. 60+ percent won.
Plays the final minute protecting a lead.
Nothing hyperbolic about it.
Luke Glendening was major part of this team.
If Luke had gotten paid really well, or gotten a huge term, I would have understood it.
But I don't understand letting him walk at numbers like these. At all.
Grand scheme of things? We still suck. No surprise. That wasn't going to change.
Mlive reports Dallas offered a better deal.I mean, it could be Luke's choice...
Says more about the team than Glendening, honestly.
Considering the GM is the same guy that noted Johan Franzen's work ethic before he blew up on the Wings (and is one of the hardest working players to play for the Wings), I am not terribly concerned about his evaluation of the anticipated compete-level of the roster. To call it "insane" is hyperbolic, no matter how you frame it.
Was part of the deal "not being Detroit"?Mlive reports Dallas offered a better deal.
Perhaps I use a different definition of insanity, because a "bad" decision where you let go of a cheap depth guy in his 30s doesn't in any way constitute "insanity" to me.I don't disagree about the level of our team.
To call it hyperbolic is hyperbolic.
Losing Glendening at 2x$1,5M is not wise.
It makes no sense.
This is a guy who for years has been held up as someone who plays the right way and is the consummate professional.
With so many young players on this team, why would you let someone like that walk?