Saturated Fats
This is water
Man, that was just an awful game altogether. I can't think of a single player that stood out as having a positive game. Maybe Beagle, Hughes, and Hamonic?
It is concerning that Petterson has been such a non-factor thusfar. I get that he's missing Miller, but he's supposed to be a difference-maker - and that's supposed to come without dependency. Also don't think that Horvat has done much since G1, other than win face-offs.
One last thing - Nate Schmidt is a really good player, but I don't know how he fits into our current system. Playing with Vegas, he was really good at facilitating the continuation of possession and instigating transition. The problem is that this Canucks team isn't particularly good at either of those things. I don't think that he's the same kind of 'body on the line' defenceman that Tanev was. And, considering how many chances this team yields, it's noticeable that those chances are getting through to the net. You could argue the same of Hamonic, who hasn't done much - good or bad - to this point.
It is concerning that Petterson has been such a non-factor thusfar. I get that he's missing Miller, but he's supposed to be a difference-maker - and that's supposed to come without dependency. Also don't think that Horvat has done much since G1, other than win face-offs.
One last thing - Nate Schmidt is a really good player, but I don't know how he fits into our current system. Playing with Vegas, he was really good at facilitating the continuation of possession and instigating transition. The problem is that this Canucks team isn't particularly good at either of those things. I don't think that he's the same kind of 'body on the line' defenceman that Tanev was. And, considering how many chances this team yields, it's noticeable that those chances are getting through to the net. You could argue the same of Hamonic, who hasn't done much - good or bad - to this point.