Shareefruck
Registered User
Don't put words in my mouth. I didn't say anything about it looking good.That's a 2nd pairing and 2 3rd pairing. 2 4/5s, 3 3rd pairing and 1-dimensional tiny offensive dman.
You have spent too much time watching the Canucks. I'm calling it Vancouver syndrome, where you becoming too acclimated to rubbish that mediocrity it starts looking good.
I've already acknowledged how limited it is, that's obvious, but I do think that it's possible to make smart decisions to get a lot out of a little and at least mitigate damage, especially if you're able to get consistent scoring. Playing Stillman and Myers a ton is not how you do that, IMO. That's setting the trash on fire.
Mediocrity/a borderline passable and serviceable average core (that could be lifted up by a strong offense) would in fact be a worthwhile upgrade on outright rubbish, yes.
I understand the tank mentality, but doom and gloom taken to the point where even discussing modest improvements gets scoffed at seems a bridge too far for me, personally.
Last edited: