dexter3x
Registered User
- Oct 23, 2017
- 1
- 0
Two young goalies, with Gibson being more proven but both with very strong starts to the season and very high potential. Who do you think will be the better goalie going forward?
That doesn't make sense. Oilers have accomplished absolutely nothing in years and McDavid is still the best player in the world.I’ll take Hart because Gibson isn’t going to go very far with that team while he’s in his prime.
That doesn't make sense. Oilers have accomplished absolutely nothing in years and McDavid is still the best player in the world.
Based on what... a season with RC as a coach and leading the league in man games missed?I’ll take Hart because Gibson isn’t going to go very far with that team while he’s in his prime.
Based on what... a season with RC as a coach and leading the league in man games missed?
Gibsons #s were pretty insane last year... given the circumstances, and hes started off where he has left off.
That's a pretty dumb take also... not like McDavid has carried oilers to anything, but he is still best in the world.So Gibson for 100 points this season? You can’t carry in that way as a goalie. If your team loses, you lose.
That's a pretty dumb take also... not like McDavid has carried oilers to anything, but he is still best in the world.
Yea.. but what are you basing this off of?Guys I’m not trying to dump on the Ducks, I like the Ducks. I just don’t see them heading in a very positive direction whereas I see the opposite for Philly.
Im not even lookin at the team really, Gibson has looked Steller3-1 start for the Ducks and they’re busting out the woodwork!
Yea.. but what are you basing this off of?
Im not even lookin at the team really, Gibson has looked Steller
the question is about Gibson vs hart , not philly vs Anaheim.
So if Anaheim is a worse team... and Gibson puts up similar #'s... wouldn't that be a + for Gibson?My opinion of both teams players and directions.
So if Anaheim is a worse team... and Gibson puts up similar #'s... wouldn't that be a + for Gibson?
I accept your opinion, I just think its dumb logicMaybe, but not if Philly makes the POs and Anaheim doesn’t. I’m not trying to create a zillion hypotheticals with you, this is my opinion. Obviously you don’t accept it.
Why would Hart need 3 seasons of Vezina worthy hockey before we can compare them? I mean, Vezina voting is pretty random but I wouldn't use that as the measuring stick considering Gibson has 4 total Vezina votes in his career. Hart and Gibson's numbers last season were almost identical, I would think that would mean more than subjective voting.Gibson is a top 3 three goalie in the league with strong arguments to be the best. The other is just a prospect still let’s wait till he has atleast 3 seasons of vezina worthy hockey till we compare