Prospect Info: General Prospect Discussion Thread 2020-21 - Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

thestonedkoala

Going Dark
Aug 27, 2004
28,253
1,617
You'd love to see Boldy's game be somewhere in style between Mark Stone and Rantanen as a bigger forward. He's not as tough as Stone, nor as good defensively, but he is a better skater at a similar age, and might have just as good of a shot.

Both very high end comparisons...I'd be thrilled if he ends up being anything close to those two players.

Boldy might not be a fast skater, but he is a good skater.

I'm hoping that Boldy becomes like Stone; 20+ goals, 40+ assists would be great.
 

Al Lagoon

Registered User
Feb 22, 2012
3,510
665
The closest thing I've seen to a power forward in a Wild sweater was Latendresse the season the Wild got him. He played some great crash-bang hockey and popped in 25 goals in 55 games, at the tender age of 22.
I know some would say poutine, but it was concussions that ruined a potentially great career.
 

GuerinUp

Registered User
Aug 1, 2009
4,067
1,199
Columbia Heights, MN
The closest thing I've seen to a power forward in a Wild sweater was Latendresse the season the Wild got him. He played some great crash-bang hockey and popped in 25 goals in 55 games, at the tender age of 22.
I know some would say poutine, but it was concussions that ruined a potentially great career.

foligno is close to that also, albeit not the same level assist wise
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurgeon

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
48,034
19,748
MN
6' was a tall man back in the 1940's. Now not so much. Of course Howe was also thick, and very strong.
 

MuckOG

Registered User
May 18, 2012
15,555
5,607
6' was a tall man back in the 1940's. Now not so much. Of course Howe was also thick, and very strong.

I'd say so.....

vintage-gordie-howe-photo-shows-off-his-amazing-physique.webp
 

BagHead

Registered User
Dec 23, 2010
6,537
3,534
Minneapolis, MN
6' was a tall man back in the 1940's. Now not so much. Of course Howe was also thick, and very strong.
I was so ready to refute this, and then I went to ourworldindata.org, and adjusted the chart for human height by year showing only US and Canada (the dominant nationalities of NHL players during the time period) and averaged them. I found that between 1940-1980 the average height of men had grown by over an inch and a half. If that rate holds true, and it's a big IF (between 1870-1905 the average American man actually got shorter), it means that by 2020 the average height for men in these countries will have grown by over 3 inches. That's a crazy amount of height!

Interestingly, Hockey Graphs shows the data in inches, and it does appear to be almost 3 inches of growth in average height for NHL players from 1940 to 2014. Weirdly, their average height numbers for the general populace don't have the growth that the other site shows. Their data shows it as roughly plateaued. I'm not sure what's causing that discrepancy. Maybe they're using different data sets.

That got more detailed than I intended, so I'm just going to say "yes, you're right".
 

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
48,034
19,748
MN
I was so ready to refute this, and then I went to ourworldindata.org, and adjusted the chart for human height by year showing only US and Canada (the dominant nationalities of NHL players during the time period) and averaged them. I found that between 1940-1980 the average height of men had grown by over an inch and a half. If that rate holds true, and it's a big IF (between 1870-1905 the average American man actually got shorter), it means that by 2020 the average height for men in these countries will have grown by over 3 inches. That's a crazy amount of height!

Interestingly, Hockey Graphs shows the data in inches, and it does appear to be almost 3 inches of growth in average height for NHL players from 1940 to 2014. Weirdly, their average height numbers for the general populace don't have the growth that the other site shows. Their data shows it as roughly plateaued. I'm not sure what's causing that discrepancy. Maybe they're using different data sets.

That got more detailed than I intended, so I'm just going to say "yes, you're right".

When will you learn that everything I say here is correct?:naughty:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad