Sorry I upset youFunny how you clearly didn't follow the conversation
Forget about Rielly being superior by pretty much every statistical measure while taking on top competition. Let HFBoards live in pretend-land.Rielly is so underrated, Hamilton is not a better D by such a large margin that this sways to Calgary. In fact I favour Rielly...
Funny how you didn't read what he wrote. He never mentioned bennet. Gaudreau is better now and going forward.
Matthews=>Monahan
Marner<Gaudreau
Nylander=Tkachuk
Rielly<Hamilton
Brown=Bennett
Pretty close
Forget about Rielly being superior by pretty much every statistical measure while taking on top competition. Let HFBoards live in pretend-land.
He's not though. What was Gaudreau even doing at Matthews/Marner's age?Funny how 104th overall Gaudreau is better than 1st overall Matthews and 4th overall Marner
Hitting puberty.He's not though. What was Gaudreau even doing at Matthews/Marner's age?
It was actually just a typo, he hit the wrong button when JetsHomer distracted him by saying Ehlers > Gaudreau.Holy **** Haatley gave us one!
Gaudreau is still better then mathews today, that is shown with evidence, unlike your assumptions in the future.lol. Matthews went from 40g and .84ppg to 34g/62games and 1.02 ppg
Gaudreau was a nobody at the same age, and he didnt have a ppg+ season until his draft + 7
Matthews >>> Monahan
Manrer < Gaudreau
Nylander = Tkachuk
Brown = Bennett
Rielly = Hamilton
players 3-5 are close. But the gap between matthews are monahan is a lot bigger than the gap between gaudreau and marner
The way I see it today, it's pretty much dead even:
Matthews = Gaudreau
Marner = Monahan
Nylander = Tkachuk
Bennett = Brown
Hamilton = Rielly
The way I see it going forward:
Matthews > Gaudreau
Marner > Monahan
Nylander < Tkachuk
Bennett > Brown
Hamilton = Rielly
I just feel like both Matthews and Marner are headed towards being 90+ point players in the very near future. That's how high I am on both of them. Matthews doing it while also being a complete two way force.
Forget about Rielly being superior by pretty much every statistical measure
Gaudreau was on pace for a 100+ season. I think 90 would have been reached quite easily if the team didn't collapse and he didn't have the issues at home with his dad.
Either way, just how Marner and Matthews have room to grow, so does Gaudreau. 24/25 years old... IMO still can hit another gear or two.
I see what you're saying, but Gaudreau has been proving people wrong his whole career. He simply keeps getting better.I don't disagree, he's a great player. But I think the odds of that happening are much lower compared to Matthews/Marner just based off historical trends. Players typically peak (at least offensively) at Gaudreau's age now. Matthews/Marner haven't even begin to enter their primes yet so unless something goes extremely wrong with their development we should expect some big improvements from them. And before I get a dozen responses saying how nothing's guaranteed and projection isn't always linear, I realize that. I'm just basing my opinion off what has the greater odds of happening (which is based of historical trends from the last 30+ years). Obviously far from a guarantee though because there's always exceptions.