The Jones Zone
Registered User
Interesting to see all the post game quotes are coming from Dubi.
where is our C?
it ain't 71
Interesting to see all the post game quotes are coming from Dubi.
where is our C?
The only reason the players are sticking up for HCTR is because they don't want a new coach that will make them work.
The only reason the players are sticking up for HCTR is because they don't want a new coach that will make them work.
Firing a coach is one way for management to show the fans it wants to win, but a better way to do that is to make sure the coach really was the problem. If Richards isn’t the problem — and a lot of people thought he was a pretty good coach last spring — then you had better replace him with a better coach when he is fired.
The Blue Jackets once fired a Hall of Fame coach supposedly because he had trouble coaching the team’s younger players. Good management might have supported Ken Hitchcock and shown the young players who didn’t like his methods the way to the American Hockey League, sending a message to current and future prima donnas that they weren’t the ones in charge.
Instead, the Jackets hired a guy in Scott Arniel, who had never been an NHL coach, and fired him less than two seasons later.
That’s why it pays to be careful.
Sometimes, the best moves are the ones you don’t make.
Bob Hunter joining in on the Dispatch's wall-to-wall coverage of 0-and-ghazi
[URL="http://bluejacketsxtra.dispatch.com/content/stories/2015/10/21/1021-hunter-column.html]http://bluejacketsxtra.dispatch.com/content/stories/2015/10/21/1021-hunter-column.html[/URL]
pipe dream imo
It said Atkinson part of the package. Devils could be asking for Atkinson + Wennberg + 1 of Bjorstrand/Milano/Rychel/1st or Atkinson + 2 of Bjorstrand/Milano/Rychel/1stpipe dream imo
Unless Shero is a Penguins sleeper agent, there's no way in hell that it's Larsson for Atkinson straight up.Probably. However, same thing would probably have been said about Saad+ for Dano+ as well.
I think the Jackets would have to sweeten the deal with more than just Atkinson. However, Atkinson to the Devils just keeps coming up. When it comes up for this long and this number of times, I start to pay more attention.
It said Atkinson part of the package. Devils could be asking for Atkinson + Wennberg + 1 of Bjorstrand/Milano/Rychel/1st or Atkinson + 2 of Bjorstrand/Milano/Rychel/1st
At that point, that's a pretty good offer for the Devils. I wouldn't be thrilled if Jarmo panics and makes that type of trade. Larsson is good but with that offer, would want a better player.
The New York Islanders beat the Blue Jackets 4-0 at Nationwide Arena on Tuesday night to drop Columbus to 0-7-0. The Blue Jackets are the first team since the 1997-98 Chicago Blackhawks to start the year with such a low marker. That Blackhawks team finished 30-39-13 with 73 points.
We can't trade a pivotal part of our offense like Wennberg can we? :-(
Considering Joey's current input, trading him wouldn't weaken the offense at all but the possible haul coming back could vastly improve the defense. One can dream right?
Well then accept the fact that Joey will get smth like 8x8.5This team took six defensemen in the draft this year, including two 1st-rounders.
No way in hell would I make a move involving Johansen for help on the back end, unless there's a real compelling reason to do so.
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-p...-straight-in-loss-to-islanders-023349878.html
18 years and approximately 30 teams per season competing. Roughly a 1 in 500 "accomplishment". A 0.2% chance of happening.
Who was the head coach for Chicago that year (he was not fired after starting 0-7)? Hint: Richards' possible replacement. Holy guacamole!
Here's how it is - the CBJ have WAY too much money already tied up in forwards for the foreseeable future, and not enough tied up in defense. In order to spend money on the defense, money must be freed up from someone on the forward corps. Throwing 8 to 9 million on Joey, and also trying to upgrade the defense, is just not going to be feasible going forward.
We are also not going to be able to throw out a defense next year that includes Werenski, Heatherington, Madaisky, and Paliotta and expect to win NHL games.
Where do people suggest the money becoming available otherwise? (And Bourque coming off the books isn't an acceptable answer.)
Trading Cam for a pick at the deadline - frees up 3.5
Buyout Boll and Campbell -saves 2 million of cap
That brings the available cap up to 9.5 to 11 million.
Ship out either Tyutin or JJ at the deadline for picks - frees up another 4 plus and would give us a ton to spend on a top UFA or 2 when added to the money that would be freed up by the above moves.
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-p...-straight-in-loss-to-islanders-023349878.html
18 years and approximately 30 teams per season competing. Roughly a 1 in 500 "accomplishment". A 0.2% chance of happening.
Who was the head coach for Chicago that year (he was not fired after starting 0-7)? Hint: Richards' possible replacement. Holy guacamole!