10000000%
And Torts is on record many times about not teaching offense .. he "doesn't wanna get in their way" ... yet here we are again fielding a team that looks completely lost on offense ... and on a related note, somewhat lost on defense despite having great depth and skill on that side as well.
.
The Jackets were a top ten offense over the last three years. I don't think it's fair to Torts to go after him on that, especially with what looks like an out of context quote. I think his point was that he doesn't micro-manage skill plays, which seems reasonable.
Not a lot of options here. Either Wennberg improves or we're leaning on Jenner or, lord forbid, Foligno. I did notice that he has done quite well on faceoffs so far, so maybe he's been putting in some work. If he starts winning 60% of his faceoffs we can use him in the defensive zone a lot more in key situations.
I doubt shots on goal are ever going to be a positive stat for him. Looking at his game, I'm not sure I really want it to be. I'd like it to be enough of a threat, however, where people have to defend against him taking the shot.
Grooming Wennberg as a shutdown center is what I've wanted for a while now (that or make him a D-man, but that ain't happening). Attitude change or not, he doesn't have the instincts for offense. The best thing you can say about Wennberg's effect on the game is that no one scores when he is on the ice, for either team, so let him handle heavier defensive loads.
I'll disagree with the pessimism about "leaning on Jenner or, lord forbid, Foligno." Those guys have been leaned on a lot more than Wennberg, despite the fact that Wennberg, who plays a lot fewer minutes, gets labeled as 2C. And Jenner is a decent 2C in my opinion. Most 2Cs aren't racking up 50+ points, our standards are out of whack on this. And Foligno is terribly inconsistent in terms of point production, but I tend to think he's a fine 3C if called upon.
