Blue Liner
Registered User
Eh, there are certain situations, plays, events within a game where having played it at a higher level can help understand things a little bit better perhaps, but I don't think it's a prerequisite to having a complete, blanket-statement better understanding of the game as a whole. I don't think it's that black and white. Look no further than the Blackhawks GM. Different sport (as mentioned) but look across town at the Cubs President of Baseball Operations. There are a lot of people in high positions doing a really good job that did not play a necessarily high level in their respective sports. You have to be really smart, and be around the game for a really long time and constantly learning, but there's enough examples out there of it.
And this is from someone who's played hockey at a high level and works in the game today. No one cares, nor should they, that's not my point, but just sparing the "well you probably didn't either so of course you feel that way" reply is all.
As for Panarin scrapping, love to see the willingness and how well he handled himself, but I'd hate to see him bust his hand or wrist and be out a while. Fine line walked there. He did a hell of a job, though.
And this is from someone who's played hockey at a high level and works in the game today. No one cares, nor should they, that's not my point, but just sparing the "well you probably didn't either so of course you feel that way" reply is all.
As for Panarin scrapping, love to see the willingness and how well he handled himself, but I'd hate to see him bust his hand or wrist and be out a while. Fine line walked there. He did a hell of a job, though.
Last edited: