Sportsnet: Friedman: TOR could take swing for 1 Year of Panarin

[zeke]

that's my dubas!!

 

[Damisoph]

this seems unlikely but dang can you imagine that top 9?

 

[zeke]

kadri for panarin+

 

[BM14]

If that's the only factor you look at, then you're making mistakes more times than not

Yea, who wants to stack the odds in the favour even more? Let's hope for a lottery ticket 4 years from now instead.

 

[BM14]

this seems unlikely but dang can you imagine that top 9?

Play with the line combos. It's fun.

 

[Nooodles]

kadri for panarin+

makes absolutely no sense

like the whole Panarin idea

 

[Glenn Isildur Healy]

Yea, who wants to stack the odds in the favour even more? Let's hope for a lottery ticket 4 years from now instead.

Let's also hope the salary cap goes away so we can play fantasy hockey

 

[BM14]

Let's also hope the salary cap goes away so we can play fantasy hockey

Because 4th line gap fillers are so hard to come by.

 

[Jimmy Firecracker]

Yeah, it’s gonna be a no from me dawg.

 

[ITM]

Expending costly assets for one year of Panarin doesn't seem like a Dubas move.

 

[Glenn Isildur Healy]

Because 4th line gap fillers are so hard to come by.

I'm sure Columbus can't wait to get their hands on our 4th liners for Panarin

 

[Tie Domi Esquire]

Unless it's for Marleau, doesn't make much sense. Or it's part of a bigger package of Panarin+ for Nylander.

 

[zeke]

people don't realize how good panarin is.

 

[CabanaBoy5]

I can't believe this is going to happen, but if you think Dubas is going to give away any future for a one year rental when you can put together a top 9 like we have already, well, you have to give your head a shake.

 

[96]

people don't realize how good panarin is.

He’s really good, might even challenge for our third best forward. But is that a luxury we can really afford to spend assets on, with this defence?

 

[Nooodles]

people don't realize how good panarin is.

people realize it. we also realize we don't need him, and at the same time, we can not afford him

 

[Walshy7]

I’m not paying nylander + for 1 year of panarin. That’s what is would cost he was a ppg player last year. Nylander has 2 61 pt seasons in the nhl at 22, at 22 panarin wasn’t even a 40 point Khler moving nylander to get panarin is exactly the move we will be so upset with when nylander is 25~

 

[BodaciousBeefBazooka]

Nothing will happen. Dont worry guys.

 

[Maple Leaf]

I'd rather trade for iceman Polak than acquire Panarin

 

[MJ65]

I don't think if we need him - as is our top 9 is stacked and it's going to cost us a lot (so no)

 

[Phion Keneuf]

I would love to acquire Panarin, but it just doesn’t make sense.

 

[Muston Atthews]

Take back Clarksons contract + throw in a little something something and we got a deal

 

[Menzinger]

He’s really good, might even challenge for our third best forward. But is that a luxury we can really afford to spend assets on, with this defence?

But this in turn Depends on the market for D men, which seemingly seems to be very pretty horribly lopsided towards sellars. If they could get Paranin for a reasonable cost it would at least be worth considering

 

[CantLoseWithMatthews]

He’s really good, might even challenge for our third best forward. But is that a luxury we can really afford to spend assets on, with this defence?

he'd challenge for our 2nd best forward to be honest. he's that good

 

[Duke16]

If it's something like Kapanen, Borgman, 2019 1st and 2020 2nd for Panarin as a rental I would reluctantly accept. Gives us a real chance to go for it and each piece given up can be replaced internally.