What I do is i'll take my top 2 elite guys and pair them with either a vet (85ish) or a Top 6 potential youngster. Youngster gets good experience and the two stars put up major numbersSo both of you have found that it’s best not to stack your three best players on your top line?
Is the ideal line formula two studs and a dud? The dud being a guy 85 offensive awareness or less, but with higher than average strength.
Naturally he'll lead the league in takeaways.Minnesota drafted a defenseman named Uriel Generous. That's an all timer.
Yeah if you have your scouting system down, you can get a top 6/top 4 potential or better in just about every roundDoes 19 still have the problem of there being too many good players in the draft?
A few months ago I went back and played NHL 12 GM mode and realized how much better drafting was. It was much harder and I had far more busts than good picks. I never even drafted a forward that made my roster during my handful of years simming.
Now in the new games every round I get a top 6/top 4 or elite player that's NHL ready. Doesn't make any sense.
This what I find really dumb about the new scouting system. You find these 'gems' in the late rounds of the draft and instantly, before a game even gets played, they become highly sought after prospects by other teams. You can literally trade someone taken with a 6th round pick that season for someone taken in the 1st. It's very poorly thought out.Yeah if you have your scouting system down, you can get a top 6/top 4 potential or better in just about every round
This is definitely one of the biggest problems with the new scouting. I like the “gem” idea but they are too common and they should only have high value to you or potentially a small handful of teams who also had him as a gem. I’m sure they’ll dial it down but right not it’s a glaring flawThis what I find really dumb about the new scouting system. You find these 'gems' in the late rounds of the draft and instantly, before a game even gets played, they become highly sought after prospects by other teams. You can literally trade someone taken with a 6th round pick that season for someone taken in the 1st. It's very poorly thought out.
This what I find really dumb about the new scouting system. You find these 'gems' in the late rounds of the draft and instantly, before a game even gets played, they become highly sought after prospects by other teams. You can literally trade someone taken with a 6th round pick that season for someone taken in the 1st. It's very poorly thought out.
No, Fog of War is on.Is this the case with Fog of War on?
You can't even see the late round picks potential, overall, and trade value, until camp, so I'm guessing this is only an issue when Fog of War is off.
Does 19 still have the problem of there being too many good players in the draft?
A few months ago I went back and played NHL 12 GM mode and realized how much better drafting was. It was much harder and I had far more busts than good picks. I never even drafted a forward that made my roster during my handful of years simming.
Now in the new games every round I get a top 6/top 4 or elite player that's NHL ready. Doesn't make any sense.
That's true 12 was a bit extreme, but I'd rather that than having the game overpopulated with talent.NHL 12 I think went to the opposite extreme, where even the top three picks in the draft were far from a sure thing to the players becoming NHLers.
Haven't done many drafts yet in 19, but haven't encountered NHL ready top-6/top-4 or elite players straight out of the draft. I have averaged about ~2-3 elite players and 2-3 top-6/top-4 players in every draft which seems ridiculously high.
There are a lot of elite potentials, but I haven't had many pan out (for me or other teams) in the way their potential would say, as they are usually like 47 overall and/or overagers in the later rounds. Even after 2 yrs they're about 65-70 and don't always become more than bottom six/bottom pair/good backups. The trade value is broken but that is up to you to keep yourself in check. Doesn't mean you can't get core players or that all elites that are drafted outside of the first round will bust, but it's not as simple as draft elite = 90 overall player.Does 19 still have the problem of there being too many good players in the draft?
A few months ago I went back and played NHL 12 GM mode and realized how much better drafting was. It was much harder and I had far more busts than good picks. I never even drafted a forward that made my roster during my handful of years simming.
Now in the new games every round I get a top 6/top 4 or elite player that's NHL ready. Doesn't make any sense.
That's true 12 was a bit extreme, but I'd rather that than having the game overpopulated with talent.
There are a lot of elite potentials, but I haven't had many pan out (for me or other teams) in the way their potential would say, as they are usually like 47 overall and/or overagers in the later rounds. Even after 2 yrs they're about 65-70 and don't always become more than bottom six/bottom pair/good backups. The trade value is broken but that is up to you to keep yourself in check. Doesn't mean you can't get core players or that all elites that are drafted outside of the first round will bust, but it's not as simple as draft elite = 90 overall player.
I liked this though. Made it so guys over 30 weren't useless and also meant there was a reason to sign free agents every year.2. Players didn't decline enough resulting in the top point getters always being players who are in their early to mid-30s.
So frustrating I thought I found a work around putting all the taken out prospects on a created team and merging the rosters from the update, only to find out created teams are no longer accessible in the player movement screenPatiently waiting for another roster update. Most AHL rosters are terribly inaccurate and lacking.