It is not anger over this trade. It is Stan going to the same well over and over and over. Like the other 30 teams don’t have anyone that can fill a 4th line ......unless they are a former Hawk. It is a Stan/org failing.It’s funny when some posters get angry over something this trivial and say “I’m done with this team” yet keep posting.
Brian Campbell, Daniel Carcillo Adam Clendening, Vinnie Hinostroza, Nikolai Khabibulin, Marcus Kruger, Andrew Ladd, Jeremy Morin, Johnny Oduya, Brandon Pirri, Brandon Saad, Patrick Sharp, Andrew Shaw, Kris Versteeg (twice).
Gotta admit that the above list of ex-Hawks brought back to the fold has mostly questionable players but not all. I think bringing back Hino was one of Stan's better decisions.
Friendly Florida fan here: Zito seems to like adding change of scenery players (Duke,Verhaege, Hinostroza) to complement our big two of Barkov and Huberdeau; for this to work, he needs to do right to the players where it doesn’t work like Hinostroza!Interesting note from The Athletic article on the trade. It looks like it was initiated by the Panthers.
Most who are bitching about this move probably don't know anything about Morrisson beyond him being a forward.
Hawks gave up absolutely Jack squat for Hino, who the Hawks were offered to get pretty much completely free because Florida's GM wanted to do right by him.
Stop complaining already.
Yep.The only reason they moved Morrison is because they were already at 49/50 contracts and needed to move one to bring one in. It's the same reason Morrison was traded to Chicago for Maatta.
We essentially got Hino for free.
Tell me one legit downside to this move. Just one.Or maybe they just have a different opinion? That’s frowned upon these days I know. I don’t mind this move but I can understand why some maybe skeptical, why be so closed minded and just label them as “clueless trolls”. I see your posts as trolling and instigating at times so there is that.
there isn't oneTell me one legit downside to this move. Just one.
Tell me one legit downside to this move. Just one.
We have to listen to Bobby gush over Hino again.
Only one guy named Morrison in Rockford nowTell me one legit downside to this move. Just one.
Maybe the Hawks didn't want to give him up in the first place and were presented an opportunity to get him back for free?
This is a minor trade that improves our depth either way, whether he was an ex-hawk or not.
What non-ex-hawk that is a better player than Hino could we have gotten for Brad Morrison? Or should we have just kept Morrison since the only upgrade available was an ex-hawk?
Tell me one legit downside to this move. Just one.
You said you were fine with it but could see why someone may be skeptical. I don't see one negative regarding this.As I stated earlier in the thread, I like this move. What I don’t like is the shutting up of anyone with different views or anything “negative”. The team has had negative results for a few years, this year looked promising for a bit and now the team is on a slide and people can’t be frustrated? I guarantee you if this team was winning no one would give a jack about this move.
Mhmm...and has Brad Morrison ever showed that he is capable of playing on the 4th line or in the NHL in general?It is not anger over this trade. It is Stan going to the same well over and over and over. Like the other 30 teams don’t have anyone that can fill a 4th line ......unless they are a former Hawk. It is a Stan/org failing.
You said you were fine with it but could see why someone may be skeptical. I don't see one negative regarding this.
I understand hating the constant positivity that some posters have. But is it any worse than your almost constant negativity? Do you feel you have to swing in the complete opposite direction to keep some sort of balance?
You ain't Thanos, you don't need to balance the universe. If you keep turning every organizational single move into a negative, people are just gonna tune your ass out.
I'm not gonna name names, but I do think a lot of people here dislike criticizing the team right now. I know I've been harped on pretty recently about consistently getting out shot in games (which oddly did not happen yesterday when we got shutout).Who exactly is the constant positivity? That is the problem with his garbage arguement, there is no one.
You said you were fine with it but could see why someone may be skeptical. I don't see one negative regarding this.
I understand hating the constant positivity that some posters have. But is it any worse than your almost constant negativity? Do you feel you have to swing in the complete opposite direction to keep some sort of balance?
You ain't Thanos, you don't need to balance the universe. If you keep turning every organizational single move into a negative, people are just gonna tune your ass out.
Why post on a forum if you don't care if people tune you out. You must hope at least one person isn't, otherwise you're basically shouting into the wind.People have the right to tune me out if they like doesn’t bother me. I am not trying to balance, I get pretty positive when the team is winning or you saw my comment here earlier.
Why post on a forum if you don't care if people tune you out. You must hope at least one person isn't, otherwise you're basically shouting into the wind.
Most don't have you on ignore, but the majority here, at least active posters, have already mentioned numerous times that they don't take you seriously. I don't know that some of the more negative posters around here, guys like BWC and MM, take you seriously.You are presenting a hypothetical scenario that all posters will ignore me because of my views, so I guess my only choice is alter my views to cater to the congregation, do you suggest I do that? Not sure what you want me to say.