Not gonna cut it for what, exactly?
We need to take two steps back in order to take four steps forward. The attitude here needs to change. Forget all-in, forget about picks for rentals.
We need a whole new approach.
I don't disagree, what I'm saying is that trading Fleury doesn't help the solution. Even during a rebuild, you need stability in net to be successful. There are A LOT of rebuilding teams that wish they had what Fleury is bringing us right now. Admittingly, I need to bite my tongue before I see him in the playoffs.
I would like to see a 3-4 year plan.
Year 1 - cut the fat and make some hard decisions on the future of players here.
Specifically:
Kunitz
Scuderi
Sutter
Dupuis
Bennett
Spaling is a decent enough bottom 6 player I would be okay keeping him however if there's a trade that needs a throw in, he's gonzo.
Ideally we can sign some younger free agents, a top 4 dman, and Sundqvist slots into the line up. We resign Comeau, Downie, Lapierre to ideally one even two year deals. We look for a combination of picks and a younger top 6 wing out of the trades. Even a deal that brings Sharp here would be okay as he's only signed through next year. We use the picks to gain at least 1 decent forward prospect. I would even support sending Sutter away for picks as well as Scuds and using what picks we do have to move up. Kapanen gets call up games. Dumoulin gets 6/7 time. Harrington gets to be 1st call up.
Letang-Maatta
Lovejoy-Petry
Pouliot-XXXXX
Dumo-Harrington
Run:
Sharp-Sid-Hornqvist
Perron-Malkin-Comeau
Downie-Sundqvist-Spaling/Bennett
XXXXX-Lapierre-Farnham
XXXX can be Spaling or the young free agent we are able to sign. Example: Panarin slots into Comeau's spot, Comeau takes 4LW.
Year 2:
Kapanen becomes a Top 6 full time forward. Harrington becomes a full time dman. We trade Lovejoy away or keep as a #5/6. The wing we drafted gets call up games. Sharp is not resigned. Decisions on bottom 6 are based on WBS players such as Wilson and available free agents and camp job wins. Ideally, we keep 1st round pick sans a major upgrade. Draft a center or wing.
Kapanen-Sid-Horny
Perron-Malkin-Wing
XXXX-Sundqvist-XXXX
XXXX-XXXX-XXXX
Letang-Maatta
Pouliot-Petry
Harrington-Dumoulin
Year 3: We look at the effectiveness of Hornqvist who is now in a contract year and how he compares to the drafted wing who had been getting call up games who is now maybe a 3rd line wing fighting for a top 6 spot. The drafted center or wing may get 3rd line or 4th line time. The signed wing a decision is made on whether or not to keep him based on play and the other 2 wings abilities to step in.
Defense remains relatively unchanged sans new partners based on play.
At this point, we have a good mix of vets (Sid, Malkin, Horny, Perron, Letang, and Maatta) and a good mix of youth (Kappy, Sundqvist, Pouliot, Harrington, Dumo, signed wing, two drafted wings/center).
We may even sign a Downie or Comeau type player if they are available at a good price. This takes up a bottom 6 spot and makes fighting for a spot that much more important to the younger guys. One thing that is maintained is the ability to have options throughout the line up. Take Minnesota right now for example. Coyle and Nino are on their 3rd line but BOTH are more than capable of top 6 time. That's what I would like. If top 6 players slip...hey sorry Perron, you haven't scored in a couple games, so and so is gonna take time with Geno this game.
Right now we don't have that luxury...at all. We need the top 6 capable players in the top 6.
Oh yeah, in this scenario, we have a new coach.